• 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Taking everything you say at face value, the options for Ukraine are:

    1. Take a deal that maybe you can’t trust, but it at least gives you time to breathe.
    2. Keep fighting, and with the war going how it is eventually lose more than what you’ve already lost.
    3. Attempt to draw other states into the conflict so that you have a shot at what might be considered a victory, likely years more down the road under the best of circumstances.

    There is no justification for 2, and 3 is highly unlikely – if other states haven’t entered the war already, they’re not going to do so now.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah point 1 is why I support a peace deal along current lines, maybe with a dmz with UN peacekeepers or something idk. Ukraine is the one getting invaded, they need time to breathe far more than Russia does.

      Even if you think Russia can’t be trusted and will invade again a few years of peace is better than ceaseless war

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would they lose more than they’ve already lost? Their expectation is that western aid will continue, allowing them an advantage over Russia in the long term. Russia thinks Western aid will dry up (maybe due to trump being elected) so their anticipated outcome is better in the long run. When the question of enduring western aid is answered, there will be less of a difference in expectations, meaning continued conflict isn’t advantages since it’d cost more than both sides gains expectations.

      I highly recommend looking into the game theory behind the war. https://youtube.com/@gametheory101

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I agree subject matter experts are important. That’s why I linked to a professor on international relations and war who wrote a book on the subject.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Hmmm? Do you know what game theory is? It explicitly deals with incentive structures and is how academics decode nations motives and goals.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Everybody knows what game theory is, however the discussion is about military capability and strategy which is best left to people who have experience in these things. Also, game theory makes plenty of assumptions which make it of questionable use in the real world. For example, game theory assumes that all actors are rational, and it’s pretty clear that the west has not been making rational decisions throughout this war.

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It includes both perceived military capacity and geopolitical strategy. Game theory helps with the latter.

                  Here’s more info on theories of Russian victory from a military analyst specializing in Russian military and a defense economist. That should help with the capacity side of the argument.

                  https://youtu.be/7rBlVnc_DEw

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Here’s a helpful tip for you. Go back and look at the predictions people made over the past two years, then see how many of those predictions were in line with what actually happened. Then stop listening to people who were consistently wrong about absolutely everything. Perun is a perfect example of somebody who was exposed as a complete and utter fraud. On the other hand, Biran Berletic made consistently accurate predictions about the direction of the war, so if you want to understand what’s happening then I can highly recommend watching his analysis https://www.youtube.com/@TheNewAtlas/videos