edit: spelling

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Yeah, but your line of thinking relies on politicians caring more about the country overall than themselves…

    They care about defense spending, because they also get “donations” from weapons manufactures.

    By no means did I mean they’re only taking money from Israel, just that Israel’s money comes with a single string:

    Support Israel no matter what

    Obviously they get money from more people

    Like, did you see the name at number 2 between the Dem candidate for 2016 and the Dem candidate for 2020/2024?

    It’s the guy (also a dem) that had gold bars lining the suits in his closest.

    They’re taking the money, because they’ll take money for almost anything.

    That’s not a conspiracy, corrupt politicians tend to care about money over everything else

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m just saying the alignment of the lobby funding and the broader american imperial interests is an important reason why this particular issue hasn’t moved much in 80 years.

      No disagreement that politicians are far too eager to take campaign contributions.

      • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What would you say are the broad american imperial interests? Maintaining regional military control for the sake of oil – thats the obvious one – but anything else?

        Genuine question here, I haven’t thought or read much about it, whereas I have thought/read more about the incentives for politicians to continue pushing the ever bloating “defense” budget.

        Edit: Here’s not a bad article about it that I just read. Basically: the new cold war with china.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Most of the geopolitics of the region revolves around oil, that much is certainly true.

          A lot of the rest of it flows downstream from that; oil pipelines and supply from various places and through the red sea, the relative military strength of adversaries in the region (derived from the wealth of their oil supplies), ect. Most of the modern geopolitical relations in the area can be tied to the struggle over oil in some way.