It is expected to be 2-3 months before Threads is ready to federate (see link). There will, inevitably, be five different reactions from instances:

  1. Federate regardless (mostly the toxic instances everyone else blocks)

  2. Federate with extreme caution and good preparation (some instances with the resources and remit from their users)

  3. Defederate (wait and see)

  4. Defederate with the intention of staying defederated

  5. Defederate with all Threads-federated instances too

It’s all good. Instances should do what works best for them and people should make their home with the instances that have the moderation policies they want.

In the interests of instances which choose options 2 or 3, perhaps we could start to build a pre-emptive block list for known bad actors on Threads?

I’m not on it but I think a fair few people are? And there are various commentaries which name some of the obvious offenders.

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I frankly prefer options 4-5. There’s no evidence that Facebook will play nice and a lot of historical evidence that they won’t. I want to be on an instance willing to take the nuclear option if it comes to it.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to think this through from the standpoint of an instance admin who is trying to figure out how to use Threads to make their instance grow. That’s really the only motivation I can think of to federate with Threads. Otherwise it’s just all downside. As a corporate social media entity, they are entirely opposed to everything Lemmy stands for philosophically, and their scale is a massive threat to the culture and operations of the much smaller fediverse. Why would anyone ever want to federate with them? Because they see it as an opportunity. To ride the dragon, thinking it can be controlled. This is madness. Choice 4 all the way and if it becomes necessary, 5.

    • jocanib@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The beauty of the Fediverse is you do not need to make everyone else agree with you. It is important that mods know what you want; what you think other people should want is irrelevant.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, you don’t need to go around making other people agree with you, on the fediverse or anywhere, really.

        But if you are going to enter into a mutual risk/benefit relationship with another party, it does help to understand what their motivations are, so you can figure out if they’re going to line up with your own, or lead to conflict.

        My post is about trying to understand those parties’ motivations. Not make everyone agree with me.

  • Bradamir@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get this platform. I’m about to just give up on social media altogether.

    I just want to know about new games and whatever else that interests me. Why’s that so hard.

    • simple@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really don’t need to care about whatever’s happening with Threads as a casual user

      • artisanrox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do need to care as a casual about data miners that would love to sell your info to health insurance companies and crackhead conspiracy theorists.

  • Obez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m starting to dislike the concept of ActivityPub. It gives power to the admins instead of to the users. Users should be able to decide what servers they connect to and what content they see. I hope another protocol like Nostr becomes more popular.

    • Bob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As an instance admin, lol.

      I’m paying for the server. I’m handling all the maintenance, moderation, etc. You’re out of your mind if you think I’m gonna allow nazis or whatever other horrible shit is out there anywhere near my instance. I’m not going to enable bigotry. Fuck that.

      Everyone can see my instance’s TOS as well as who I’ve defederated and why. If they don’t like it, they can find another instance. They’re not entitled to an account on mine.

  • vtez44@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only real threats of Threads federation are EEE and server overload. Not the people from there or privacy. If someone wants to see some content you don’t want to see, like some opinion you don’t like, they should be able to see it. I don’t understand why there would be such list, it would be pure censorship and waste of time. I have heard Threads has a pretty good moderation, so that solves this problem anyway.

    I don’t get what would defederating with Facebook-federated instances gives you, though.

    • monerobull@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get what would defederating with Facebook-federated instances gives you, though.

      Means the instance isn’t part of the hive mind and we obviously can’t have that!

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am a fediverse enthusiast and I am excited for Threads federating. I hope it incentivises Tumblr to federate also and then we actually finally have proper choice.

        • Kerrigor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see you’re not familiar with EEE. This is a classic move by enterprise to kill an open competitor.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am. How could they kill the fediverse? If they tried to kill it, it would only return to how things was. Chances are tumblr could join in and then they couldn’t easily extinguish it.

            • Kerrigor@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ever heard of XMPP?

              If a single party participating in an open standard is large enough, they can go off the track, and then kill off interoperability.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But this isn’t a single party. Mastodon and Lemmy and Kbin are well established

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    5 is an absolutely horrible idea.

    1 and 2 are best

  • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    4 is honestly my preference. I don’t see the need to defederate from instances that federate with Threads. But I do want to see a list of instances that federate with Threads so I can personally never comment or post there. I don’t like the idea of comments and posts I make being used to generate ad revenue for Facebook.

  • samothtiger@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If 9 regular people sit down with a nazi without protest, you have 10 nazis. Threads will absolutely not stop nazis from posting nazi stuff. We know this because Facebook is full of nazis. Why would anyone want nazis at their table? Because they’re nazis. Anyone who wants to federate with Threads is a nazi. Do you want to federate with nazis? Option 5 is really the only way to keep the nazis away from the table. This is not an exaggeration. There are literal nazis given free reign on Facebook. There will be literal nazis given free reign on Threads. If you don’t stop the nazis because you want to interact with your friends who interact with nazis, you’re enabling nazis. Don’t enable nazis. I can’t stress enough they are literally nazis.

    • The Grunkler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get your point, but by the time I finished reading your comment my brain stopped registering nazi as anything more than a series of letters