• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    it seems safe to assume Newsweek looked for the highest pro Biden result, and presented as something they intentionally checked for.

    Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. That’s the other reason I didn’t post the Newsweek article as a story. I’ve absolutely seen this from “the other side,” but that doesn’t mean that the answer is dueling cherry-picked samples. I only brought it up as a way of making the argument that failing to limit to only likely voters is a very significant flaw in OP’s poll.

    To me, the factual analysis of which candidate people should be supporting based on how they’re performing is the main thing to look at, with how the polls are looking as sort of a distant tactical afterthought because it’s obviously relevant on some level to how the election is shaping up.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      But it’s not a fault of the poll…

      When you look at actual poll results, it’s not just one percentage, all the data is broken down.

      My point was the problem is Newsweek reviewing the results, finding what agrees with them the most, and presenting that as a valid result.

      It doesn’t mean that the poll is flawed, just that someone is intentionally misrepresenting the results.

      You’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater if you think anything anyone has said in this thread means polls arent real.