I’ve worked with some pretty rotten software, but management software is easily the most user unfriendly, so my vote goes to HPSM.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah that was BS. Boss was told to say anything other than “to save money”. That’s the entire value prop for Teams.

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know, but the rollout playbook is to pump up the Office integrations, not showcase the cost savings. Because normal end users don’t care.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          And then people don’t even use the office integrations, which are pretty much the only good thing Teams has. The integration of PowerPoint with meetings is actually pretty good, but the number of presentations I’ve sat through where someone just screen shared their PowerPoint window is absurd.

          • plz1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            They can detect that too, so Microsoft “could” automate the better way.