• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    […] react very quickly to increased demand. You categorically cannot do that with nuclear, where did you learn this?

    This is not correct.

    A Brief Survey of Load-Following Capabilities in Modern Nuclear Power Plants

    Load-following NPPs in France claim power output ramps as much as 5%/min if necessary, though typical ramps are kept below 1.5%/min.

    Certain French NPPs routinely decrease power output 50% at night.

    It’s true that load-following is mostly not done with nuclear in the US, but this is policy/common practice/habit, not a technical limitation of nuclear power plants.

    Also, I mentioned pumped hydro storage to point out specifically that battery technology really isn’t effective enough yet. It still doesn’t scale well, it’s too expensive for large grids.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is not correct.

      It is, you just proved it yourself:

      “typical ramps are kept below 1.5%/min.”

      Compare that with batteries or pumped hydro.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s plenty fast enough for a power grid.

        1.5% of 900MW is 13.5MW. That’s plenty of power output scaling per minute.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I think you’re getting peaker plants, e.g gas fired confused with load following.

          Nuclear plants are not used as peaker plants. you incorrectly stated that they are.

          • MaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It’s a shame that you’re being voted down here, even though your points are actually more on the factual side. Well, that’s probably the fate of those who “dare” to say something against nuclear. Even if everyone else demonstrably doesn’t have a clue about the subject: They’re still bashing it. It’s just good that downvotes on Lemmy don’t really matter.