• hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you dont understand why the specific instruction set you studied isnt the point you should maybe po back to school.

      • Auzy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That is true… However, I guess I’m a bit salty we didn’t do ARM instead

        That being said, admittedly, I’ve never used assembly again anyway lol (except once, for reverse engineering something)

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mobile phones like the N97 were already using ARM… Whilst it might have been about learning the algorithms, one could argue considering the cost of university that we should at least get taught on the best platform (obviously RISC based in this case).

      One could make the same argument about anything though. I could argue they shouldn’t have even taught X86 architecture, and taught TempleOS instead of Unix Tools (after all, it’s NOT the point). The point is to learn, but it is also to avoid double learning AFTER uni too.

      I will give them props for at least teaching us OpenGL at the time instead of Glide (that was a good decision).