Stamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 年前At least this is logicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square94linkfedilinkarrow-up1449arrow-down185
arrow-up1364arrow-down1imageAt least this is logicallemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square94linkfedilink
minus-squaremelooone@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 年前I prefer RFC 3339. It allows you to omit the “T” for example. Like this: 1985-04-12 23:20:50Z
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·2 年前Either is preferable to the abomination in the meme.
minus-squaregornius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 年前Imo, the more strict the format the better. Less ambiguity == less confusing when it doesn’t work and easier parser to write.
I prefer RFC 3339. It allows you to omit the “T” for example. Like this: 1985-04-12 23:20:50Z
Either is preferable to the abomination in the meme.
Imo, the more strict the format the better. Less ambiguity == less confusing when it doesn’t work and easier parser to write.