• blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    basically everyone is just explaining to me that it’s illegal to vote for him. That’s what I just said. Explain it all you want but it ain’t democracy.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s regulated democracy.

      It turns out that if you don’t regulate things to some extent, humans exploit them. Who would’ve thought huh?

      Plus, did you forget what the insurrection was about? You don’t get much more undemocratic than trying to flatout deny the results of the democratic process.

      In one case you have a democracy with defenses against corruption (imperfect but still present), in the other case you have something that is just flatout not democracy in any definition of the word.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Theres a lot of regulated democracies in the world. North Korea has elections every 4 years. For allowed candidates of course.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I can’t vote for:

          • Arnold Schwartzeneggar <- Constitution regulates, saying,“Sorry, not born here”

          • Billie Eilish <- Constitution regulates, saying,“Sorry, not seasoned enough. Try again in a few elections.”

          • Donald trump <- Constitution regulates, saying,“Sorry, you engaged in insurrection. Fuck right the hell off.”

          Not saying I would if I could, just saying.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right, again telling me its illegal, i already know. It aint democratic for all those examples. Especially the age one, man we need younger reps.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well when you establish democracy after you’ve already destroyed the entire foundation of it, it makes it a lot easier to get the results you want.

          Exactly why the insurrection was kindof an issue.

          Pretty bad faith to argue North Korea though, like there aren’t a lot of other things with the situation that make it massively different from whats happening here.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            No I’d say North Korea’s whole situation boils down to that concept of state sanctioned candidates. For a situation a bit closer to ours, id point to Russia barring candidates from running for opposing the war.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Senate is not democracy. Within the Senate, the smallest state is equal to the largest state. Wyoming is equal to California.

      The Bill of Rights is not democratic. The Bill of Rights restricts voters from inflicting their populist will on a minority that does not share their beliefs.

      The judicial branch is the least “democratic” concept within the Constitution. The judicial branch grants overwhelming authority to a small, unelected group, and makes that group responsible for dealing with all matters related to the accused. We don’t get to vote on whether to spare the accused, or feed them into a woodchipper; that power has been stripped from the people, and is thus undemocratically wielded.

      Section 3 of the 14th amendment is not “Democratic” in the same way that the Senate, Bill of Rights, and Judiciary are not “Democratic”. It is constitutionally essential for the same reasons that the Senate, Bill of Rights, and the Judicial Branch are essential.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most of these are flaws in how our government works. No person’s vote should count more than anothers, but thats just what disproportionate representation accomplishes in the senate and the electoral college.

        The Bill of Rights itself was democratically ratified. The majority of people dont want minorities to be discriminated against.

        And boy the supreme court is a mess lately. The lifetime appointments and lack of ethical oversight.

    • kurwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “illegal to vote for him” lmao you make it sound like you’re gonna get arrested for doing it. No one cares if you write his name in, his names just not going to be on the ballot because he’s a traitor.