• Bri Guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 months ago

    Yeah we’re basically hurting their revenue by using Piped and other ways to bypass Google’s ads. They wouldn’t be profitable if everyone stopped watching those ads

    • Xylight (Photon dev)
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5611 months ago

      Noooooooooo! The poor google 😢

      their $412,378/s has been reduced to $412,367/s! 😭 😭

      • @Ricaz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -3911 months ago

        Yeah, they should provide thousands of gigiabits of video streaming to everyone for free. It’s our right!

        • Nowhereman
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3211 months ago

          It’s not for free. They use your data. Also most of these ‘free’ videos are made by enthusiasts.

          • @candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1411 months ago

            Most of what they use your data for is to serve you ads. If you’re blocking ads, that data isn’t all that valuable.

            • @Contend6248@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              They still have valuable data, they collect how interesting something is, so you’re even contributing to the algorithm and you essentially advertise videos you’re watching to other users with similar interests on the platform. People without adblock will come plenty.

              That ad blocking on Youtube makes you a worthless user for anyone on there is just not true.

              I would consider disabling my ad-blocker on there and use official clients, but they are just going so far beyond anything i could take with how many ads i’m getting then. I see it as their fault not being able to find an acceptable amount.

            • VinceUnderReview
              link
              fedilink
              911 months ago

              Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they’ve achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

              • @Ricaz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                That’s not what I’m saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what’s your point?

                • VinceUnderReview
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 months ago

                  That’s there’s not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don’t understand your point now.

            • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              611 months ago

              Yes but they can’t anyways because google never fixed their completely borked content ID system. Half the people I watch just assume that all of their videos will be demonitized anyways. They make all of their money off of patreon.

              • @Ricaz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                711 months ago

                I’m no Google fan, but it’s borderline impossible to moderate a site of that size. It’s a legal nightmare that cannot be solved by just humans. Read some articles about the human moderators of sites like YouTube and Facebook. Those people see some shit.

                But yes, YouTube should definitely improve their escalation system, and pay more attention to refuted strikes. It sucks to see innocent creators get punished by a broken system.

            • @iegod@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              As a contributor who doesn’t monetize videos, you don’t speak for everyone.

        • monkA
          link
          1611 months ago

          Big platforms tend to forget they’re big because they’re free. It’s our duty to remind them.

        • @Durotar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1211 months ago

          I wish the product was somewhat good too. Piped has features that even YT Premium users don’t have.

          • FLemmingO
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You know they wouldn’t get paid if nobody watched the ads. And if they didn’t get paid they wouldn’t have any reason to pay to run the site. Explaining that a corporation will not run a site like YouTube for free (which it wouldn’t even be, it costs a lot of money to run) if they weren’t getting paid. Quit attacking other users simply for pointing out facts. It’s beneath you (I think)

              • FLemmingO
                link
                fedilink
                English
                411 months ago

                I never said that Google is on the verge of collapse, nor did I defend them. I merely stated that Google is a corporation, driven by profit, and expecting Google to act in the interest of anything but their own profits is a fool’s fantasy. Quit putting words in people’s mouths. It’s unbecoming of anyone that wants to have a legitimate discussion and it’s just toxic.

    • @acastcandream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They’re making plenty of profit selling all of our data  and getting ad revenue from the 95%+ of other users who aren’t blocking them.

      • @YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Exactly, you either get my data or my money. That’s how I feel about every service nowadays, I don’t think its unethical to subvert payment requirements when they have been selling my privacy for years.