into unstable isotopes

No, they were there all along.

And then there are thermonuclear generators

Started at Information Retrival and ended up at collective intelligence​.

Thank you, wikipedia, for good exploratory search

No, you don’t understand, this is all communist propaganda! /j

No, I mean private company beating everyone who they don’t want to see on elections

Will say “it is not goverment, so it doesn’t count”

Basically US can create US LLC and deny to anyone based on anything.

NOW the headlines are absurdist satire, and the world has decided to bite the onion SO HARD that real life headlines are just as absurdist and satire adjacent, that you’re easily forgiven for not knowing the difference between ketchup and catsup.

Basically american version of soviet anecdotes.

Reminds about interview with creator of Masyanya.

“How your script is always so ridiculous and prophetic?”

“I just look at current trends and extrapolate.”

As I understand it was employer-based ban, not country-based.

…it’s not. It is stupid, it stalls mainlining of Baikal, but it is not a racism.

It is good to satisfy your values with friendship and ponies.

the thing they are citing actually exists

In case of RAGs it exists in searched dataset.

and if it does exist, contains the information it claims.

Not guaranteed.

Read it. I don’t think it will have bigger impact than lossy image compression or noisy raytraced images.

Reminds me of how artists are starting to embed data and metadata in their pieces that fuck up AI training data.

It still trains AI. Even adding noise does. Remember captchas?

Metadata… unlikely to do anything.

Some african with megabits per second. Which was much faster than any local ISP.

Professor: “Even my dog has higher h-index than you”

Mail dataset in standard-compliant way. Like RFC1149. Don’t forget that carrier should be avian carrier.

we didn’t have the space to store them locally because they were up to a PB.

Local is very vague word. It can be argued, that anything, that doesn’t fit into L1 cache is not local.

LLMs can’t cite. They don’t know what a citation is other than a collection of text of a specific style

LLMs can cite. It’s called Retrival-Augmented Generation. Basically LLM that can do Information Retrival, which is just academic term for search engines.

You’d be lucky if the number of references equalled the number of referenced items even if you were lucky enough to get real sources out of an LLM

You can just print retrival logs into references. Well, kinda stretching definition of “just”.

Wrong example. Here better example would be “does anyone remember how underfunded were those studies, that said smoking was not healthy?”