The image doesn’t open for me. But I guess the joke still works in a way.
The image doesn’t open for me. But I guess the joke still works in a way.
I would have thought the jet in the picture was a Mexican Cartel jet.
sudo laugh-get [audible]
Yes that’s it! Thanks for the link!!
Adding to the fun - The light is still going the same speed within the medium, but it’s bumping into more things. Those collisions divert the light, lengthening the distance it travels through something like 1 cm of glass vs 1 cm in a vacuum. It changes the time it takes to travel through glass rather than the speed at which the light is moving.
At least that’s what I remember from a YouTube video.
Good bot
Not sci Fi specific, but this is for detailed drawings.
https://lemm.ee/c/wimmelbilder
Edit: damn no posts yet :(
Other Edit: !wimmelbilder@lemm.ee
To add to this, the US already has a universal symbol for pharmacies. It’s a capital R with the slanted leg extended past the bottom of the R and crossed to make a X.
That’s probably not a bad approach in general, but sometimes shit matters.
I wish I understood this because it seems funny
I used to agree that people should be able to vote directly on issues. Not sure where I land anymore. We seem way more vulnerable to propaganda than one would have expected.
If the status quo somehow carries on for another decade I wouldn’t be surprised if the 20% to 30% of extremist nuts becomes 50% or higher.
Wish I had a solution.
Man I thought for sure it was going to be a guy making allegations against Kanye
Breath of the Wild has entered the chat
Not exactly what we’re talking about, but remember how your legs would feel after roller skating for a couple hours?
You’d have sea legs for a while afterwards where walking feels a bit like skating.
I wonder if hackers could find and distribute porn consumption details for the politicians pushing shit like this?
This is me literally doing that right now.
Guess that’s what a good lawyer will buy you.
She’s been careful to avoid making rulings because bad rulings can get her kicked off the case. Wherever possible, she reschedules, indefinitely postpones, or otherwise delays the trial because judges have a TON of say in how they schedule things.
She made a couple bad rulings early on and got reversed and admonished by a panel of judges. That’s two strikes.
She made another bad ruling about allowing redacted information in the defense’s filings to be seen by the public. Smith started the process of going to the other judges again, but she reversed her own bad ruling that time before it escalated to the other judges.
Now in this request she’s made another bad ruling. This may well be strike 3. Smith will certainly appeal to have the changes implemented. Whether he also brings up the other two incidents and asks for her to be removed is yet to be seen.
The thing is, you only get 1 chance to have the judge removed. And if it doesn’t work, you’re stuck with an even more hostile judge for the rest of the trial. Smith has to balance the need to have the trial before the election (already too late) against having enough justification for the extreme action of having a federal judge removed from a case against their will.
And it fired the whole bullet casing and all.
“That’s 65% more bullet per bullet.”