Oops, my bad

so you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?

That’s not how the square root is defined.

You’re confusing “square root of 100” with “the answer to x^2 = 100”. These are different things.

Does it really matter if the delivery system is inferior? Google says they have five thousand warheads. Even if 4900 get intercepted (98% success rate), 100 nukes will connect.

Also, besides the launch silos, there’s the bombers and the nuclear subs, which are enough to end the world by themselves

So you’re a communist that denounces every communist project atop an ivory tower, instead of understanding the realities of actually building a socialist society (no magical button that will make us overcome hierarchies overnight, I’m afraid). Sounds like you’re just larping about being a communist

Are you implying that you don’t remember that experience, or that salvia caused you memory issues?

Yeah, one exists nationwide (credit score) and the other was some proposed municipality plan that didn’t go anywhere

We also lost all the bribe money we had to pay to buy this factory in the first place.

How can you type this with a straight face holy shit

Going by the same logic Iran is also a winner because they got a live test for their drones and missiles

I find it funny that when people from other instances disagree with something here, they introduce themselves in a similar fashion as you:

I’m an advocate for democracy, human rights, and civil liberty with an aversion to harm

Every socialist is an advocate for these things as well. How can someone advocate for workplace democracy without being an advocate for democracy in general? Isn’t working to alleviate poverty (like China, where they have already lifted 700+ million people out of it) a victory for human rights? Isn’t a system where everyone is accountable and can’t use their wealth to circumvent the law an improvement for civil liberties? And lastly, every human who isn’t a psychopath has an aversion to harm…

Meanwhile, liberalism also claims to advocate for these things, but with no actions to back them. How can someone claim that choosing which rich people party to vote for every 4 years is democratic? Yet most people don’t challenge this claim. How can someone claim to be an advocate for human rights but take no action against homelessness and poverty? Historically, why is it that most (if not all) human rights declarations happened in slave-owning and/or imperialist countries?

It can if you don’t do a train-test split.

But even if you consider the training set only, having zero loss is definitely a bad sign.

That implication wasn’t made. The original comment mentions how it took men 70 years to drain it (meaning that the drainage started during the USSR), and the comment below does not challenge that fact.

This does not dispute his claim that most of the evaporation happened post-USSR.

grep file ...

Impressive mental gymnastics. So the “starving” Cubans live more than Americans because Americans have “too much” bread?

"It’s not a war crime but if it is they deserve it’

From which site were those screenshots taken? Is the description broadcasted by the ships somehow, or added by someone?

spaces in rm are a classic one, they’re even mentioned in the Unix-haters handbook

Not excusing Vanguard, but if you’re running Windows then your entire kernel is a blob. If you’re running most linux distros, then your kernel contains blobs for drivers.

In their defense, it’s free for personal use. If they want to milk enterprise clients who can’t be bothered updating their systems, who cares