

You forgot to mention the part where they specifically said your opinions are unanimously agreed to be shitty
You forgot to mention the part where they specifically said your opinions are unanimously agreed to be shitty
“Socialist Chaos Trow” lol
Even for you, this is depressingly, mind numbingly dumb to point that you just decreased everyone’s IQ who read this.
And yet the hatred you constantly exude evokes conservatism and the voting you push helps conservatives. Putin would salivate at your post history.
That’s the best summary possible
Everybody capable of rational thought knows that. However there are plenty of tankie douchebags who would love to tell you what a wrong ShItLiB you are for saying this basic truth
Smugly is the perfect word for it. People like that turn my stomach with their attitudes
Looks like you’ve been hard at work blocking since people actually agree with you now
Yes, I want my philosophy forced on everyone. And that philosophy is eating shit freely! Thus sHiTlIb!!!1
Wait I got confused for a second. What I meant to write was: I don’t care.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
So anything is fine by you as long as Trump benefits. You claim to be against genocide though?
Then I guess we can stop recommending Jill Stein to people.
Yeah, maybe. Doesn’t sound attractive to me though, there are already several ways to authenticate which work fine.
I mean how would this work though, even assuming that technology hurdle is cleared (definitely doubting it, a slightly dark room can totally hose a cell phone photo)?
The Twitter app has to request camera use and then ask the user to do that. What possible benefit would there be for the user?
How exactly would a phone camera get a clear image of your retina? I very much doubt anything like this is possible but maybe I’m missing something
Wiremin is closed source. Why would anyone use that over mastodon?
I thought a lot of people did leave Twitter. I did a few months ago.
Firstly, thank you for that ban. Did you notice the duplicate section in my comment? Low effort comments, dismissiveness, refusing to engage in good faith even when someone treats him very respectively, and copy-pasting the same responses many times is only one of several signs this is a troll. This behavior breaks rule 4.
I do not understand how anyone could possibly look at the evidence I provided and say “nah, not a troll”.
For your convenience:
Top 10 duplicate (total 617 exact and 318 fuzzy, 70% or more similar) submissions from UniversalMonk@lemmy.world found.
'Thank you!' x 27
'Yep!' x 24
'k' x 23
'Agreed!' x 21
'I don't know what you mean.' x 20
'I don't have to explain anything to you. Thanks!' x 14
'Right?' x 13
'Every vote for Harris is stealing a vote from thir...' x 12
'Exactly!' x 11
'To cut through the nonsense and save everyone time...' x 10