“Triple-headed remote-controlled vibrating crack scratcher”

You’ve got a bad case of Chlamydia

Oddly specific. Donnie, is that you, trying to get ahead of a video that’s about to leak?

It’s okay, this happened outside the environment.

Historically, that is correct. However, the technology to automate this is extremely accessible now and low/no cost. Also, there was no widespread threat of misuse via AI in the past, so I get that there was no need in the past. Going forward, I think it’s something we need to think about.

Today, the same photo you presented could be misused with AI to meaningfully obscure what is going on and confuse people about who held what kind of views. So there’s a double-edged sword here.

Just to be clear, I do believe in the right to photograph anyone and anything in public, at least in the United States and any other countries that respect that freedom. I’m just trying to point out that the issue is complicated.

In your example at the end, why can’t the other people’s faces be blurred out before releasing the photo? Just playing devil’s advocate on that point.

Ten bucks says it was a DNS issue.

justice123

“ON THE NEXT EPISODE OF… YOU GOT JUNKED!”

deleted by creator

Always use sunscreen.

So much time, effort, and resources wasted towards trying to fine someone $500 for doing something humane. Our “leaders” are out of touch with reality. Can we fine them for wasting our tax dollars on shit that doesn’t matter?

What is the fundamental nature and purpose of the universe?

So, basically you can rent one of these pieces of shit for a whole year, for free, as long as you cover the gas and mileage fees? Cool cool. I personally wouldn’t take one if you paid me to, but that seems like a good deal for some people who may want to take advantage.