

Egypt is not as technologically advanced as Israel.
Egypt would be getting the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip in exchange for it giving up a piece of the Sinai to Israel.


Egypt is not as technologically advanced as Israel.
Egypt would be getting the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip in exchange for it giving up a piece of the Sinai to Israel.


They will live in Palestine, but it will be part of Egypt instead of being occupied by the Israelis.


The Monarchy brings money into the UK because things associated with the Monarchy draws tourism. As long as the Royal Family is popular, it will draw crowds. That’s the reason Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are important. King Charles and Prince Williams don’t see this because of their dislike for Prince Harry and his wife. The UK government, however, must realize the couple is an asset.


That’s when he was young. He also fought in Afghanistan. In contrast, his father and brother although in the military never saw combat.


The UK should hire Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as part time representatives. They would be sent to various countries especially those in the Commonwealth to improve ties. Markle would be especially popular with nonwhites. They would be paid per visit with funds from the Royal Family. King Charles dislikes his son too much to realize the couple is an asset to the UK.


Explain why it’s dumb.


Your analogy is incorrect. In my proposal Israel gets something new, a chunk of the Sinai. In your analogy, I get nothing new.


This is my proposal to end the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Egypt will be given the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip. In return, Israel will be given the Gaza Strip and land at least 3 times larger than the West Bank in the Sinai Peninsula. Some of the land will be adjacent to water so Israel can build desalination plants. The Sinai is inhospitable, and Egypt doesn’t have the technology to develop it, but Israel does. With its new land, Egypt can give it to the Palestinians, make it a state within Egypt, or whatever it wants.


Israel is a prosperous country. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Israel
The economy of Israel is a highly developed free-market economy.[23][4][24][25][26] The prosperity of Israel’s advanced economy allows the country to have a sophisticated welfare state, a powerful modern military said to possess a nuclear-weapons capability with a full nuclear triad, modern infrastructure equivalent to developed countries, and a high-technology sector competitively on par with Silicon Valley.[23] It has the second-largest number of startup companies in the world after the United States,[27][needs update] and the third-largest number of NASDAQ-listed companies after the U.S. and China.[28] American companies, such as Intel,[29] Microsoft,[30] and Apple,[31][32] built their first overseas research and development facilities in Israel. More than 400 high-tech multi-national corporations, such as IBM, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Cisco Systems, Facebook and Motorola have opened R&D centers throughout the country.[33] As of 2025, the IMF estimated Israel has the 25th largest economy in the world by nominal GDP, and one of the biggest economies in the Middle East.[1]


The US will not boycott Israel. Consequently, your idea is similar to Aesop’s Fables, The Mice in Council. See https://aesopsfables.org/F184_The-Mice-in-Council.html


No, Prince Harry exemplifies the qualities of an ideal Democratic candidate. He is young, articulate, has a pretty, intelligent wife and two children, and a war veteran. However, his views would have to be centrist.


Andy Beshear would have been a better Democratic Presidential candidate.


The US will never stop supporting Israel. Believing otherwise is a fantasy.


Trump was elected President because of the stupidity of the Democratic Party. They selected an old man who was too far to the left. For example, Biden let illegal migrants flood in despite polls showing most Americans wanted secure borders. Then when he dropped out, it was too late to have another convention to select a replacement. Instead, Kamala Harris was appointed, a person who so dumb said she would have done nothing different than Biden despite knowing that the Republican strategy was to associate her with Biden.


Talarico should concentrate on courting Republicans and independents. In a Red state like Texas, his policies have to be not too far to the left.


How do you propose doing that?


Prince Harry exemplifies the qualities of I mentioned except I don’t know whether his views are centrists and of course he is not a US citizen, but John F. Kennedy would be another example.


The ideal Senate Democrat should have centrist views, young, a military veteran, articulate, and a family man. Prince Harry would be an example if he were a US citizen and had centrist views.


This is my proposal to end the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Egypt will be given the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip. In return, Israel will be given the Gaza Strip and land at least 3 times larger than the West Bank in the Sinai Peninsula. Some of the land will be adjacent to water so Israel can build desalination plants. The Sinai is inhospitable, and Egypt doesn’t have the technology to develop it, but Israel does. With its new land, Egypt can give it to the Palestinians, make it a state within Egypt, or whatever it wants.
In contrast, Trump is betting on oil. This might cause the US to fall technologically behind in the development of green energy.