I think the toyota corolla is a cool car and it doesnt exist as a plugin hybrid was my main reason for buying it. Other than that, the Toyota C-HR exists as mild hybrid and as plugin hybrid and the plugin hybrid is 6k € more expensive (new).

Yes using it without charging it would be almost the same as a mild hybrid but the cars are literally more expensive.

They had a record year in 2023 and were outperforming 2023 for the first 3 quarters of 2024 (full year 2024 will be released later i guess). So right now they are still doing fine, but they need to change something for the future.

The A3 costs like 10k more (New price). With similar age/KM as mine they are like 7k more (not many on the market tbh). And if I had 20k and really wanted to save the enviorenment and reduce my Co2 output I would buy a old used car for 5k and plant trees for 15k.

Oh, sorry i thought its about EV’s. I recently bought a car and thought about getting a Audi A3 Plugin Hybrid but decided for the toyota Corolla hybrid because I couldnt charge it at home and driving out to Charge + drive out to get fuel is kinda annoying. And it still says that the A3 would need like 14.7KWH + 0,3L / 100km so its really not cheaper by a factor of 3 or 4 but rather by 1.2

Not everyone has their own home. Fueling up is much faster. EV’s are more expensive when buying. Hybrids have much longer range. EV’s at 15kwh/100km would be depending on the price end up at like 4-6€/100km, Hybrids at 4L/100km would end up at like 7€/100km.

Well, average Fuel Consumption for petrol engines in germany is 7.7L, so if you drive a mild hybrid that has 4-5L it still helps.

Edit: also i just realized that its new cars registrations for december, not total share.

Crazy to me that EV + Hybrid is larger than petrol cars already.

Where do i not believe in the truth?

Would you say if someone else murders a million people its fine for you to murder 3?

As i stated before, they are not responsible for the overwhelming majority, they are just much higher per person.

Even if you fix the top 1% to 0 you are still left with 84,1% of the previous emitted Co2.

I do agree that there should be reductions but not just to the top 1% and definitely dont blame someone as an excuse to be bad yourself.

Is blaming a worse group an excuse for a larger group to ignore everything?

So you are below 2000$ per year?

If you rephrase these stats, the group from top 50% to top 1% is responsible for 76,4% of Co2. pretty sure you are in that group.

Checked the full data, it went down compared to 2000 aswell. But to me some of the data doesnt add up. Also the source has the numbers from the title from 2019 to 2022, not 2020 to 2022.

Because taking that index and looking at the 2 years where we had peak restrictions for humans because of covid seems kinda picky. If you have a index like that it probably makes sense to compare it over longer timespans like 10 years.

useless data