Source?
Source?
“It’s not our fault, we just produce cheap goods, the pollution is the fault of the people buying the goods”
If your products are cheap because you’re polluting, you are the problem. If you weren’t polluting, your products wouldn’t be as cheap. If your products weren’t as cheap, they wouldn’t be competitive on the capitalist market. If they weren’t competitive, they wouldn’t be bought.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Is it usable with hybrid graphics in a laptop yet? I’ve heard about horrible battery drain and sleep issues before.
They don’t even try to claim they’ll stop collecting your data. No one actually cares about seeing a targeted vs non-targeted advertisement; the targeting technology is the issue.
Paying Facebook $14 a month and still being tracked, just invisibly, solves nobody’s problem.
To quote Epic Rap Battles of History, “Why’d you name your company after your dick?”
This setting can be disabled. It sounds like it’s for sites that are exploiting vulnerabilities in extensions to install malware. Firefox already includes Google Safe Browsing to warn for malicious sites, so I’m assuming this is just another hardening mechanism to (1) mitigate damage from someone bypassing GSB and (2) allow Mozilla to take action before Google does. Rest assured, if Firefox started using this to push advertisements through or allow tracking, the community would be in UPROAR.
Native English speaker here. Option 4 “sounds” more acceptable than 2. Maybe it’s because you can more easily imply where the flowers are?
When Bush stops a recount he’s stealing an election, but when Trump wants a recount he’s also trying to steal an election?
I’m a fan of it but wish there was a Linux app and an easier way to sync my data between devices. I have the backup files synced with Nextcloud but it’s still not intuitive.
Are you insinuating that the United States has criminally prosecuted individuals purely for their support for Palestine? Any examples?
Read those articles and explain how the US is violating them? Also, your article is in an unknown journal from a place without free speech.
Edit: Love the downvotes from people not bothering to check the primary sources.“US is bad so they must be violating international law with sanctions”
No countries recognize a right to protest at any time and location. Imagine if someone could protest the government by just forming a human circle around the leaders shouting, “you can’t move us!” or by standing in a library and yelling constantly.
Thank you! I’ll probably just use KYC because I’m not a high value target and the alternative for me is just buying and spending Bitcoin.
How do you get your XMR? I looked into it once but it seemed like a hassle
Welcome to Linux, friends
You cannot trust a government to routinely create arbitrary standards used to regulate that same government.
This is different from a government enforcing your average law because this law applies to the election process itself and allows for significant bias. Where there is room for bias in this process, it will be taken advantage of. Look at gerrymandering.
What problem does your law actually solve? If people are willing to elect a candidate, isn’t that a sufficient measure of competency? At best you’re creating an elitist state controlled by those who set the bar for competency, and at worst you’re creating a one party state.
I’m sorry that you expect each unknowing consumer to have the intellectual capacity to understand the geopolitical consequences of each product they by based on the environmental damage and human rights violations during its production.
It’s almost like you’re the fool for expecting such a flawed system to work. Saying, “well, you paid me to do it!” does not absolve you of guilt.