This is a false equivalency. The NYT has historically been complicit in manufacturing consent for US foreign policy interests with coverage framing and agenda-setting. By choosing what stories to cover and how to cover them, they can promote certain perspectives while downplaying others. Another user in this thread already pointed out that the author of this article is a pro-Israel propagandist.
Oh look, the NYT manufacturing consent for the military industrial complex. What a surprise.
…see why kids love cinnamon toast crunch?
We all know why. I’m just surprised the hospital responded with a lawsuit instead of a “go fuck yourself.”
Guarantee Trump learned the word “indemnify” right before that speech.
choose how you die
Old age.
Because it costs me $60 to walk into the fucking grocery store.