Ah, i see, you are the one who needs to re-read my comment then

I read it again and it says the same thing, what am I missing

Stealing money from gambling organizations is ethical what are you talking about

“Test it’s IQ”. The fact that you think IQ is a useful test for intelligence tells me everything I need to know

You can still have money and markets. The fundamental problem is the ownership of land and businesses.

Legalize real root beer

If people were properly incentived we could easily automate out the fast majority of fast food and retail work. The only reason they haven’t is because minimum wage labor is so ludicrously cheap they don’t need to bother.

The self driving and AI stuff is pretty stupid though.

It’s only technically a book, but I’m still going to recommend Homestuck. It’s one of the most “made for the internet” stories out there when that’s what you’re looking for.

https://bambosh.dev/unofficial-homestuck-collection/ is recommended since flash died.

That’s not a jumping spider

“Trump is a clown but he won’t be defending himself”

When you’re on a budget, the emotional support clowns start looking real affordable and appealing

Youtube comments are still a meme. Useless vapid nonsense isn’t much better than mean comments. Looking at the YouTube comments section is always a mistake.

Maybe if he prompted chatgpt to be as confusing as possible

In the presentation they mentioned that the whole zone resets if you die to the boss, preventing you from grinding down its health. That implies to me that they want them to be a more significant part of the game.

You said it perfectly, it’s his reputation as a good actor, not the good acting itself. Stars get payed a ludicrous amount of money, you can easily find a decent actor for less and have plenty to spare to train them up.

The face is everything, they plaster it all over the advertising and it works. People will talk about the new movie: “oh and it has actor C in it” “in that case I’ll take a look”

The Turing test was never meant to be a test of a machine’s ability to think. It was meant to boil that question down into a question that can actually be answered, but the original question remains unanswered.

In my opinion, when general AI arrives it will not be an “open debate”, the consequences will be dramatic, far-reaching and rapid.

It’s at its worst when a paper describes how they account for correlation or designed their experiment to confirm causation, but someone doesn’t read the paper and says the line anyway.

You don’t need to read the paper but don’t try to act smart if you can’t be bothered.