data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2d3a/f2d3a0e7fab91741fe039e860488ef946c59e9e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f28e1/f28e16c55d40f1b837f2db036d27c35a696a252a" alt=""
Just put Dot as GM, she can keep the brothers in line.
I’m David. I live in Tacoma, Washington. I do square foot gardening, home automation with Home Assistant, and have too many cats.
You think you saw me behind some ferns? You just might have!
Just put Dot as GM, she can keep the brothers in line.
There are a couple ‘Other - Please Specify’ fields I definitely filled out with ‘Do not do AI’.
I get the joke, but with no prior context it’s kind of a jerk move to assume the player already opened it if they asked for a perception OR an investigation. A Mimic would normally just ambush you OR attack when the player opens them. If it was opened it’s probably already attacking, and if it was closed then performing a perception shouldn’t cause initiative until rolled (if the mimic noticed you noticing it, for instance).
I’ll…I’ll crawl back into my dingy nerd tavern now…
Ah, this looks like it’s a snap to use.
Supply chains are literally chains of suppliers, e.g. vendors. Your ‘simplest electronic product’ could absolutely be constrained by whom you choose to work with.
If your vendor locks you into buying from a certain source, and their vendor requires the same, and so on up the chain, how would you describe that dynamic to differentiate from a single vendor being the point of restriction?
To your point that the phrase didn’t exist, here are three supply-chain oriented papers that directly reference the phrase: This paper is exploring the social dynamics of buyers and sellers:
Lock-in situations in supply chains: A social exchange theoretic study of sourcing arrangements
Specifically, we believe that the examination of lock-in situations between a manufacturer and its supplier, i.e., instances where for all intent and purposes, one party is heavily dependent upon the other party, with few alternatives, under social exchange theory, can provide new insights into controlled self-interest behaviors (e.g., strategies) in on-going supply chain relationships.
This paper is about supply chains in plastic management, but the phrase is here:
Business models and sustainable plastic management: A systematic review of the literature
Barriers frequently mentioned were high costs, complexity of new systems, supply chain lock-in and low customer buy-in.
And here’s a paper about optimizing your supply chain where it is referenced as something to avoid:
Orchestrating cradle-to-cradle innovation across the value chain
This one even has a handy definition:
Supply chain lock-in:
Contracts and strong dependencies with suppliers not supporting circularity (e.g., either due to non-willingness or lock-in in production facilities optimized for linear concepts).
I suppose if you would like to be super extra pendantic Wikipedia does have you covered with “Collective Monopolistic Vendor Lock-in”.
Try another search engine: https://xo.wtf/search?q=what+is+supply-chain+lock-in
In case you needed to look it up like I did: Impact of gravity on fluid dynamics, gravity waves: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_wave Impact of gravitational fields in astrophysics, gravitational waves: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave
unrepentant nano gang rise up
Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Shakespeare, study finds
Maybe the monkey can be a little less of a dick, for science?!
Pumpkins Georg, who lives in spooky bog & disposes of over 15 million pumpkins every day, is an outlier and should not have been counted.
kale is a delicious vegetable
(˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
KALE DOESN’T EXIST IT’S CABBAGE ALL THE WAY DOWN
( •̀ - •́ )
AND NEITHER DO VEGETABLES
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
geologists get hot and bothered about balacmagma
Yeah, you might need some combination of fail2ban for rude AI and cloudflare caching or something.
I think that’s the way to go. A bunch of northern countries have already started working on 2 and 3 - in that more natural, more restricted lighting is available in the city. Especially during the winter, it can suck when daylight lasts only 10 hours or less.
And the dark is just dangerous, even in modern times. For better or worse some primal part of me ‘knows’ that civilization means keeping the lights on and I think most people would agree. We can just be way more responsible and less impactful to nature with it.
I imagine Autumnal Damage would be similar to winter arriving in Bone, but with falling leaves.
When there is a total solar eclipse, the temperature does drop dramatically. But it might not be detectable on the other side right away for sure.
That’s right politicians, it’s once again time for CONDITIONAL_SOUP’S THREE MINUTES OF TRANSIT.
Tonight's story: Every man older than OldMan.getMinimumAge() has been in perfect *unchanging* health for the last few months‽ To find out why, stay tuned! Our experts chime in to help you understand....
Don’t worry, I’m sure we can come up with a way to explode the sun much sooner than that.
Don’t worry, if the bridge breaks there are two backup bridges conveniently located close by!