Man I just discovered planktons villain backstory.

As a software dev I don’t call them bugs. Just happy little accidents.

My client renders this as ( c )

This can also be used a great example of proof by contradiction: There is no correct answer in the options. Proof: Assume there was a correct answer in the options. Then it must be either 25%, 50% or 60%. Now we make a case distinction.

(A) Assume it was 25. Then there would be two of four correct options yielding in a probability of 50%. Therefore 50 must be the correct answer. -> contradiction.

(B) Assume it was 50. Then there would be one of four correct options yielding in a probability of 25%. Therefore the answer is 25. -> contradiction.

© Assume it was 60%. Since only 0,1,2,3 or 4 of the answers can be correct the probability of choosing the right answer must be one of 0% 25% 50% 75% or 100%. -> contradiction.

Because of (A), (B) and ©, it cannot be 25, 50% or 60%. -> contradiction.

I mean conceptually, not physically like between a park area and a road.

I think there is a difference between air quality (pollution) and co2 levels.

Like I always think that people don’t get one thing about trees in a city. There purpose is is not about co2. The co2 reduction of city trees is neglectable. The reason you need them in a city is temperature regulation, shade, air quality, mood, the local eco system and maybe solidifying unsealed ground. Putting these tanks in a city is laughably inefficient w.r.t. co2 conversion if you compare this to any effort to do this in instustrial capacity ( which is is also still laughably inefficient)

What is extroverted introverted?

I would advise against those clean code books. There is no such thing as „clean code“. How you code always depends on what u want achieve, how much effort u can / want to put into, the skills of u and your collaborators, and generally experience.

Yeah… Exposing your autistic sons „strangeness“ to the internet sure seems healthy for that kid…

man hes gone have to do a lot of walking again… Offtopic: The funny thing is TREE(3) is an absurdly long distance, independent of the physical unit. Even TREE(3) times the planck length is unimaginable long, as the ratio between a meter and the planck length is absolutely neglectable against such super large numbers.

Oh the agony