I have repeated this argument elsewhere but I can say it again. When you are running a mainstream instance, you should be obliged to uphold every dissenting voices. Otherwise you will end up effectively censoring free speech. Your argument is extremely narrow minded

Triggered by advocacy for free speech? I have seen lots of braindead clowns like you

Censoring for differences in political opinion is an obvious violation of freedom of speech. If you don’t like them, censor them for yourself. Why are you advocating what others should or shouldn’t hear?