Seal in the microplastics

“I’ll downvote people who point out my behavior”\ - The common cope

Crapple heads will buy anything their programmers tell them to.

Go on China. Do it!

After seeing what Western “support” did to Afghanistan and how long it takes to get anything to Ukraine, it’s not surprising. The West is barely able to provide the minimum for Ukraine and they are on the same continent. If Russia turned its sights on Mongolia, they’d be fucked.

How the hell would the Mongols to fend off the Russians? How would supplies from Western allies even reach them? Fly through Russian airspace over the polar circle? Fly through Russia? Through Kazakhstan?

Those tracks look like wood🤨 That can’t be normal, right?

That’s generalizing. You know quite well that going to strip bar isn’t the same as “watching a live band”. I could just take your examples further: can’t people just find pleasure in their own minds? Why not just imagine being somewhere? In fact, what’s the point of imagination? Pleasure is a waste of time and we should just never be happy because life is pointless. Since it’s pointless, we shouldn’t exist.

I’m asking about a very specific thing because I want to understand that specific thing. Your response is like answering the question “why don’t sunni and shia believe the same thing, it’s Islam” with “people believe different things and that’s alright”. Or “why does Joel and Hardy have beef?” with “some people don’t like each other, OK?”. Or “is this correct?” with “it depends”. It adds nothing of value and doesn’t really answer the question. It’s a bad faith answer.

But why would you want that? Is it the physical touch? Is it the attention? Is it the thrill of a physically attractive human showing fake interest and making you hornier than before?

Isn’t a hooker better? I mean, if you can afford a strip club, can’t you afford a hooker? And if you can’t afford it, why not jerk off?

I’m still perplexed by the behavior.

Never understood strip clubs. What’s the point? Can’t you just get aroused at home? Why pay extra for it?

Until is has a use, technically, it is useless.

I agree. I’m pretty sure a bunch of stuff that Euler did was considered useless until it actually was used hundreds of years later. I’m pretty sure topology had a lot of people wondering what the hell to use it for until it was rediscovered multiple times.

Theory without application is useless, isn’t it?

The only way we’ll get Peertube mass-adopted is by monetizing is it

P.S monetisation != ads

https://www.tax-the-rich.eu/

End of the collection period: 9-Oct-2024

Time is running out!

But unironically

The reason for this is the austerity measures taken by the Chancellery and the Ministry of Finance. Finance Minister Christian Lindner conveyed the request in a letter to Defence Minister Boris Pistorius on 5 August.

Ukraine: another victim of austerity 😩

“Anyone I disagree with is an incel”

Thank the greed. Even bad results should be kept. It’s still knowledge. To get closer to a goal, many mistakes are made and we have to learn from them. Using the scientific method to find out that something does not work is still valuable.

Let’s be honest: it looks like shit and interrupts the flow of a sentence. The alternative of writing both words completely also makes sentences way longer than they should be.

Every gendered language would have to make massive changes to become ungendered and change their grammar too. There’s quite a large list of ungendered languages.

German, to my knowledge, is like Russian and has cases which change the ending of a noun depending on the purpose in the sentence (subject, direct object, indirect object, possessor, location, time, …). Languages with only male and female would have to add a neutral ending, and languages with 3 grammatical genders would have to either use the neutral ending - if there is one, or make a new one specific to living beings.

Then of course pronouns would have to be changed too. In English they/them is already confusing enough when talking about a singular person to somebody and the person doesn’t know it’s a single person e.g “I talked to them today” - a group or a person? Until hints are dropped it isn’t clear. The most logical would’ve been “it”, but that’s used for inanimate objects. I’m sure there’s a neutral third person singular pronoun languages could borrow instead of using the second person plural.

How long can they be used? Mine always wear out really quickly for some reason.