Easy deploy makes it very simple, just basic Linux knowledge is needed: https://github.com/ubergeek77/Lemmy-Easy-Deploy
Admin of lemmy.name, he/him
Easy deploy makes it very simple, just basic Linux knowledge is needed: https://github.com/ubergeek77/Lemmy-Easy-Deploy
Fortunately, they don’t need to! There are dozens of small open instances, and joining any of them helps the current centralization situation.
I run my own as well, feel free to make a post over in !selfhosted@lemmy.world if you have any issues!
A Mastodon alternative apparently. Seems they haven’t implemented ActivityPub yet? I’ll stay away.
The more I look at this, the more I doubt an AI was involved. Too many aspects of the clothing, body, etc are just way too consistent.
deleted by creator
I’ve been warning people that Google making up their own web standards will end in disaster, for years.
This does not prove your point. You said “most countries”, not “countries I arbitrarily deem to be important.”
The bill still leaves enforcement of specific content up to the platforms… so it seems they’re implying their own posts on these topics would be generally considered misinformation? I respect the honesty lol
Musk uses that term in his own way - the “free speech absolutist” line came from him talking in reference to Twitter moderation. He consistently claims to allow his critics to say whatever they wish without consequences.
I’ve heard that statement nearly verbatim from people who were entirely serious - and judging from my upvote count (and the original comment downvotes), several others thought you were serious as well.
Edit - Wait, I thought you were the creator of the original comment - you aren’t. There’s still a very good chance this isn’t sarcasm.
Section 702 should either not be renewed at all, or renewed with restrictions to require a warrant for US person searches. The FBI has shown they cannot handle this power as is.
Since weed is significantly less dangerous than tabacco or alcohol, I assume you’re for a complete ban on both of them as well?
It’s not hard. In fact, the recent Twitter rebrand to X is just his latest attempt to launch X.com - he has tried before and failed.
The CCDH do not have the resources to fight Twitter alone. This is clearly an attempt to scare them into silence with legal fees.
Those who wish may donate here.
Just donated to the CCDH, they definitely don’t have the resources to fight Twitter alone.
Given that Twitter trust and safety was almost completely gutted upon his acquisition, I think it’s very improbable that type of content was moderated effectively.
Hello fellow Minnesotans!
Ungoogled Chromium doesn’t send data to Google servers, if that’s what you are implying it is misinformation.
Also, Chromium is open source - you can very easily know what is being sent. I appreciate privacy awareness, but not baseless fearmongering.
No, like the peanut butter brand Jif.