Slueth

All I take from this is that you’re distraught I don’t agree with you.

How does pointing that out make me a fanboy? Interesting you chose to call names and denounce instead of being civil like @viking@infosec.pub. Why is that?

Yes. 25% of U.S. citizens linguistically means 25% of all U.S. citizens. They don’t need to specify alive, because they had to be alive inorder to participate. It is not dishonest in this case because they (the original study) listed the date the survey was conducted and didn’t not try to portray an old study as modern.

The only thing needed is to add ‘surveyed’ after the descriptor. Anything else is dishonest.

Here in the next few weeks. I want to ensure nothing breaks, but I really just haven’t gotten around to it.

Photon has infinite scrolling :). lemmyusa.com runs it

25% of 800 U.S. citizens surveyed is not indicative of the entire country. Not only that, the original study release here (as far as I could find) doesn’t state how or where the survey was conducted.

A survey done in California would be wildly different than one done in Mississippi. That article and this post are ethically dishonest, and the study proves absolutely nothing.