aanes_appreciator [he/him, comrade/them]

Welsh, Social Ecology and Jineology enjoyer, and computer programmer.

  • 1 Post
  • 356 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2025

help-circle
  • Oh absolutely. Whether or not Iran has evidence to prove it, they know that the Americans and Israelis know the status of rhe F-35s, and the announcements of their destruction is as much to create panic; especially amongst the Imperialist politicians who aren’t privy to sensitive military affairs. Even without evidence they’ll be asking very difficult questions such as “has our decades-long, massively expensive wunderwaffen program just eaten shit in Western Iran?”.

    For the average civilian, they dont need to give visual evidence just yet. They may not ever, in fact, if they believe it would give up sensitive information such as:

    • What weapon hit it?

    • Where did the weapon impact it?

    • Where in Iran did it go down?

    • How much of the wreckage is intact?

    We only got pictures in Pakistan and India because the line of contact is highly populated and the fighting occurred over civilian airspace. If a jet goes down in Iran there’s a good chance it was operating over military sites that (should) have been cleared of civilians very quickly.




  • Killing Khameini? Ngl I wouldnt buy into the strongman claims on social media. Both sides have engaged in what could more likely be psy ops than reality -

    Israelis: claiming air superiority, knowledge of Khameini’s location, CCTV inside missile cities, burning tyres, public appeals to recruit dissidents, claims of imminent US involvement nearly every night this week.

    Iran: claiming F-35s being shot down, “compromising” Israeli air defence missiles, telling civilians to flee Tel Aviv and Haifa, various claims that the missile attacks are a fraction of their capabilities, and various ominous claims of iminent escalation.

    Not that none of this are based on truth, but that their public announcements over social media are intentional to either tie up security resources of the other side, or to mislead the public (and hopefully influential politicians of the other side) of their capabilities.

    Id call it propaganda, which overlaps somewhat, but the targets of these claims are as much the political classes of the various nations at play as it is civilians and military personnel.


  • They also have air launched nuclear weapons, which IMO would give Israel plausible deniability if they used one on a nuclear site.

    No matter the facts of the strike, the media will work overtime to convince us that any radiation was from the site itself. Israel could even claim the site isnt as deep as suggested.

    Politically, governments don’t rely on the media as much as they rely on available intelligence. Would they believe the IAEA’s assessment? What if they said Israel didn’t? Would they admit the truth, even if would inevitably push a bunch of states to proliferate? Would the Americans (who will be the first to know for sure) provide cover? Would Trump run his mouth if Israel nuked someone without his consent?



  • Trump is playing a fine line between appeasing his war hawk advisors who would otherwise air their dirty laundry, and not wanting to get into a mess he knows will kill his isolationist rhetoric and everything his political career stands on.

    As for whether he makes the call? Fuck knows. I’m certain it was most likely the first night after the NSC meeting and Iran’s “remembered for centuries” statement. Every day after may be followed by more buildup, but politically is a sign that Trump isn’t as willing to press the button as we thought. The buildup since is definitely a sign that the war hawks are trying to further convince trump of their superior position and ability to contain the Iranian response.