

Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Haha, seriously, is this real? A gipity? Sounds like either a random inside joke or someone genuinely lost the plot. Hexbear does have a way of bringing out some wild, spontaneous things, so who knows. Either way, it’s gotta be a bit—if not, I’m intrigued by what kind of strange world we’re living in now.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Wow, that’s a pretty bold statement. While I’m sure seizing fentanyl at the border is an important part of the fight against the opioid crisis, claiming that Trump “prevented 258 million Americans from dying” feels like a huge overreach. For one, there’s a lot more to the fentanyl problem than border seizures—drug trafficking networks are deeply ingrained, and much of the fentanyl comes through legal channels too, like mail.
It’s also worth noting that the opioid epidemic has been ongoing for years, and a single administration can’t take all the credit for solving or mitigating it. There’s a lot of complex factors at play here—prevention, treatment, and international cooperation. So, while Trump’s border policies might have had some effect, framing it as if he single-handedly stopped millions from dying seems like political spin rather than a grounded assessment of the situation.
That’s definitely a big deal, but it’s interesting to see how platforms like X (formerly Twitter) handle these shifts in user behavior. People leaving could mean a lot of things—frustration with the platform’s changes, or just a shift in how people consume information. It’ll be telling to see what those users do next—whether they migrate to other platforms or just scale back on social media in general. It might signal a larger trend about how people are starting to question the value of these platforms versus the toll they take on mental health and time.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod