This is bad parody. If it was coming from an unknown source, I would think it is supporting the racist rumor, not making fun of the people spreading it. I could see JD Vance sharing this unironically, and that is a bad place to be
This is bad parody. If it was coming from an unknown source, I would think it is supporting the racist rumor, not making fun of the people spreading it. I could see JD Vance sharing this unironically, and that is a bad place to be
Seattle style is also a thing if you’re into regional dogs.
The meme itself is making fun of the very fake, very racist rumor being spread by the US right wing that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, CO are stealing and eating pets. I don’t think it is successful in the parody here, though. If this was coming from an unknown source I would think it is trying to spread that rumor. The only reason I got that it was meant to be parody was the face that Chris is sharing it.
We call that smothered here on the west coast, but you have to request it.
I think they are leaving out the part where they called it “The GIMP” in the 90s. They clearly chose the name to be edgy, and they are now trying to justify it after the fact. Complaining about the “sterilization” of language is just out of touch and leaves out the fact that if they stopped using the word, it might just completely fall out of use.
Not a thing for whole city cooling, but awnings are a great option for individual home cooling in places where AC is not the norm but it is getting hotter.
He is kinda cat like. Just wants to lay on the couch, loves string toys. But in case you missed it, the cat is pretty much sitting on the dog. He is on the left of the pic
For fucking sure. The local lost dog Facebook had 102 posts in 20 hours thanks to the 4th. Not to mention people with PTSD and all the fucking litter and shit air quality
I disagree that it is worth a watch, but don’t let that stop ya. Just know that the like is not universal and it is fine to not like it. Or to like it if you do, didn’t mean to imply otherwise
something is unethical without stating or at least implying a specific ethical philosophy.
Which is why I followed it up by saying the best we can do is harm reduction by choosing the less harmful paths when we find them. Nothing you are saying is different to what I said, just a different wording
A. Not a “dude”
B. I’ll pose the same rhetorical as I did to the other person that didn’t think popularity was support:
If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?
I’m not sure of the origin, but that is a fair point. I typically us it in the context of there is no way to find a harm free source of anything in a capitalist society, so you have to find the path with the least amount of harm in it. That is basically what you are saying, but just tweaking the stated definition of ethical.
What? It was your hypothetical
Self described tankies.
If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?
I agree with spreading the news of the wild shit that comes out of all their mouths, but you have to be able to distinguish it from the shit they are spreading. I would not be surprised in the slightest to see this on Vance’s twitter in support of his claim.
When it boils down to it, would you feel comfortable showing this to a Haitian person?