Also yes
Also yes
Take the raads-r test. It’s so close to a psychiatrist evaluation that it has a high confidence even for a self test. https://embrace-autism.com/raads-r/
Just knowing you are autistic and learning about it can improve your life
Lol, you think he reads?
As someone else said above, it is hard to calculate exactly how much they gained.
Instead using a set % of revenue would be simpler. If enough companies do it, raise the %. If someone repeatedly does it relative to others, raise the % for them on each repeated case.
That way it is simple, but still scalable and adjustable.
Similarly, scale it down if it disproportionate to how much is saved by breaking the law, or how much it hurts the society , to ensure it is a just punishment, and not a tool for big corporations to hurt smaller ones etc.
But I didn’t do anything productive so I don’t deserve the pillow.
Blåhaj here I come!
I asked in a similar thread a while ago and the answer is no, you have to type them each out and as for importing you need to go into each user to block.
What’s stopping someone from creating a new one. The devs? “Please select a username for your account” when creating your first character. After that you cannot change it, and is linked to all your characters. If you get reported, the report would include the account name = unique “John1836q83” getting banned.
This enforces band the same way as PSN linked email would do, but is all ingame and accessible to 100% of players that own the game.
If it is a simple popup that has 0 implications and is only visible when reporting, no one would care, and definitely not enough to boycott the entire game.
They obviously want to force psn account for other reasons.
Good read. Thanks. Will bookmark this for sure!
I like the idea of the multiple choice. I’ll do that for my next campaign
I don’t even own the game. Im just saying, if their argument is unique identifiers, there are more ways than a third party solution. It’s not like they don’t have options. They chose this over any other solution. If they did a unique identifier ingame, no one would complain. So the reason they chose this is something else then being the only solution.
Why can’t they make a unique username when you create a character the first time that is just your “account name”? That would give you the samw powers as a psn username when it comes to banning. Edit:spelling
As long ad there are at least two companies in an area, it will be less profitable for every extra property versus your competitor. That at least makes hoarding harder, as anyone can come in to out compete the two duopolies as their first will be way more profitable than the established’s 11th. In turn, keeping prices down, scaled by the increase in taxes per extra property
“can be” passed to the renters, but in a free market someone else can do that for cheaper if it is their second home vs their 20th.
Each successive property is less and less profitable the more you have, compared to others that don’t have as many.
Had nothing to do with race or media. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
While I don’t want to support weapons, blaming people that bought the vr headset in the past for what he would do with the money after the sale is a very bad take. You can’t blame them for not knowing the future.
Also the argument itself doesn’t make much sense and can be strawmaned to “you pay taxes, therefore you are a complicit in the murders of your military, therefore you are a bad person”.
Haha, nice. I had to go back to read his post twice to see what you were talking about.
No, because there are error bars on “things”, and “everyone”, and “knows”, and on “by the time they are 30”.
This means that statistically, following a Bell curve on where people land based on this, there will be some that will be much older, and much younger that have heard of a specific thing to the point of “knowing” it.
A long uhhhhhmmmm until they stop talking