deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Is the 7 supposed to be a dogwhistle or something?

Well, sure, but that was six months ago.

So basically subreddit simulator?

You can eat paint. You shouldn’t, but you can. He also has a court date so that’s quite the dedication if it was a stunt.

Dubai is in the United Arab Emirates, not Saudi Arabia.

Do they really think that using these scummy tactics will somehow result in more positive opinions towards AI?

Well, where would someone complain about their scummy tactics? All the places where they could have were shut down.

Is there a plan to migrate away from lemmy or is that just part of the joke?

So, I’m not an expert study-reader or anything, but it looks like they took some questions from the MMLU, modified it in some unspecified way and put it into 3 categories (AI, human, AI-human), and after accounting for skill, determined that people with higher theory of mind had a slightly better outcome than people with lower theory of mind. They determined this based on what the people being tested wrote to the AI, but what they wrote isn’t in the study.
What they didn’t do is state that people with higher theory of mind are more likely to use AI or anything like that. The study also doesn’t mention empathy at all, though I guess it could be inferred.

Not that any of that actually matters because how they determined how much “theory of mind” each person had was to ask Gemini 2.5 and GPT-4o.

I could also see the response to the bubble bursting being something like “At least the economy crashing delayed the murderous superintelligence.”

Same here, I’ve never actually seen the term “clanker” be used in reference to a person using the AI, but the AI itself. Which to me was analogous to going to an expensive bakery and accusing the bread of ripping you off instead of the baker (or whoever was setting prices, which wouldn’t be the bread).

If there was any sort of op going on (which I don’t think there is), I’d guess it would be from the AI doomers who want people to think of these things as things with enough self-awareness that something like “clanker” would actually insult them (but, again, probably not, IMO).

Forgive my stupidity, but I don’t know what this means. Or it’s referencing something I don’t know.

Because a company has to be x more valuable than it was last quarter. Then it has to be done again, and again, and again, forever.

Depends, he made an anti-GMO video on SciShow about a decade ago yet eventually walked it back. He seemed to be forgiven for that.

That’s what I was thinking as well. All they have to do is look the other way.

Status: 400
Method: GET
Domain: awful.systems
File: 4ad24dq16-b1c0-4c48-fcb14eab5266.jpeg
Initiator: img
Type: x-unknown-content-type
Transferred: Service Worker
Size: 0 B

Not sure where I’m supposed to look for that tbh.

Other images are fine, weirdly enough, just not that one.

The next logical step in order to make AIs more reliable is making them rely less and less in their training and rely more on their analytical/reasoning capabilities.

Uh, yeah.