

Sure they will.


Sure they will.

Yea, I’m pretty sure that we can’t, and shouldn’t, recognize Iran controlling the strait.
We are going to have to accept Iran controlling the strait, though.


They are focusing on issues they have universal condemnation, and are undeniably the responsibility of the current regime.
If you try to rally around big picture issues, you better be sure everyone seems the same big picture, and agrees on what should be done and how to do it and who should do it.
There are people who think the war in Iran is gong great. There are those that think it’s going poorly, but that we can and should win. There are those that recognize it’s a disaster, but believe that it was necessary, or at least desirable to take action against Iran, just not like this.
But everyone hates high gas prices.
It means I think everyone else is an asshole.
I might be too, but I don’t think I am.
At least I understand the words in the explanation.
But who the duck dislike being called a good boy?


Seems an odd thing to do. I rather liked it.


Knots is a measure of distance, and the fact that people have been using that wrong for several centuries
We’ve only been sailing for “several centuries.” How long was it a measure of distance before people started using it wrong?


I was under the impression that navy ships could go much faster, but didn’t because of wear and fuel consumption. I recall hearing about 60 knots, but I wouldn’t place even a small bet on it.
Same for cargo ships, to a lesser extent. If an empty one felt a need to move, I’m sure they could get a little speed to them. But they aren’t built for it, and “saving money on fuel” is their prime directive.
Although, as someone noted elsewhere, there don’t seem to be any actual measurements of speed. They turned around, and cranked the throttle, but we don’t know how far they were going in either phase.


I find that reasonably unlikely, unless it is a naval ship. I don’t think cargo ships go that fast unless empty, and highly motivated. Possibly not even then.
Do we have a reliable source for this data?


I’m being accurate. “Knots” is “nautical miles per hour,” as you correctly described.


The fact that you are measuring speed in knots per hour invalidates your point.
Please use a correct measurement, and try again.

Amen. The web page will be fine.
The web page will be fine.


Also, that one didn’t seem to leave any scars.
I think that refusing to hold her hand was unforgivable.


I mentioned to my wife, after Sam had asked, that the Doctor had, in fact, been in love at least once, and maybe three times, but I wasn’t sure one of them counted.
Seems I was wrong. That one did count.


I wonder why the old TOS fans like me are less impatient with fundamentals of human existence being presented through the growth of young adults?
I’m a TNG person myself. One thing that I very much liked about TNG, DS9, SNW, and to an extent VOY was the competency porn. (And then totally inverted in LDK)
This show doesn’t have much of that. It doesn’t even have what ENT had, which learning to be the professionals we want to see. This is still kids learning to be adults. That’s a different journey entirely.
Don’t get me wrong, I quite like it. But it has issues. But then, don’t they all?


Past the JemHadar Commandant, and Nog’s name on the wall, you mean?
First the one, then the other.
The positive side effects are usually just the effects.


The reality is ALL performing contracts come with a clause that allows the performers to cancel at any time, for any reason
Why would anyone sign such a contract? I thought the whole point of a contract was to guarantee the exchange of money, goods, and services?
I mean, as a worthless consumer, I agree to such things all the time, because I have no choice. I should think a performing venue has slightly more leverage.
I really liked the episode with him and the Cardassian lad. The two of them bonding over Keiko’s over-enthusiastic cultural dishes was wonderful.
And I’d like to think that it softened him on Cardassians, a bit.