[Laughs in interventionalism]

Also, graveyards are peaceful.

I wasn’t sure what to think so I asked Chat GPT:

Generative AI has both positive and negative impacts on critical thinking.

Positive Impacts:

1. Enhanced Creativity – AI can provide new perspectives, generate diverse ideas, and help users refine their thoughts by offering alternatives they might not have considered.

2. Faster Information Processing – AI can summarize complex topics, analyze data, and highlight key points, allowing users to focus on higher-order thinking rather than just gathering information.

3. Personalized Learning – AI-driven tools can adapt to a learner’s needs, prompting deeper engagement with concepts through tailored questioning and explanations.

4. Encouraging Debate – AI can present multiple viewpoints on an issue, fostering critical analysis and debate rather than one-sided thinking.

Negative Impacts:

1. Reduced Analytical Effort – If people rely too much on AI-generated content without questioning it, their ability to analyze and synthesize information may weaken.

2. Potential Bias Reinforcement – AI models can reflect biases in their training data, which, if unchallenged, may reinforce misinformation or flawed reasoning.

3. Over-Reliance on AI – Excessive dependence on AI for problem-solving can lead to a decline in independent thinking and problem-solving skills.

4. Misinformation Risks – AI can generate plausible but false information, and without critical scrutiny, users may accept incorrect conclusions.

Conclusion:

Generative AI can be a powerful tool for critical thinking when used responsibly, as a supplement rather than a substitute. The key is to engage actively with AI-generated content, question its validity, and use it to enhance—not replace—one’s analytical skills.

What’s your perspective—do you see it as more of a benefit or a risk?

OANN: “DEI grant for Homo…'gasms for high…cat.”

Because of the implication.

That’s what I was going for! Sorry about dinner.

Crazy town, banana pants!

That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.

Aren’t those just from the gay space lasers and Jewish hurricanes? I feel like their resistance means we’re on the right path.

Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.

Counterpoint: nuh-uh (They et. al., good ol’ days).

Citations

They et. al. (Good ol’ days). Trump proves that YouTube videos about The Creator that validate your feelings are equivalent to science. Many People Are Saying, 1(2), 10–20. Things I done heard. https://doi.org/I forget

Thanks. I hate it.

Yeah, it needs more JPEG.

Habanero crepes. Going down is only the first half. The next day is wrath part 2.