REgon [they/them]

¡El Tigre!

Hahaha I tried to find a way to express your ability to create funny new phrasings, while still sticking to theme of the text (drivel, spit, etc) without being mean. Didn’t quite work sadly

Lmao at the fucking audacity to post the most common drivel known to man and then call @UlyssesT@hexbear.net a bot
I could train an LLM on Reddit and have it spit out your dime-a-dozen takes after 5 minutes. I’ve got no clue where to start if I wanted a machine to spit out his wordslurries.

That’s typical though, it’s always the most average NPC-types that think they’re big thinkers with big thoughts the rest of us haven’t heard before. Your type will wander into any conversation and say “heh, but what about [thing everyone knows], bet you didn’t consider that!” and if you get any pushback it’s obviously not because people are capable of independent thought - you aren’t, and you’re so smart!

In conclusion fuck your mother

Lmao scratch a selfish lib…

> calls hexbear an echo chamber

> applauds instances for defederating it

> talks about introspection

Why would I give a shit what boomers think of me?

Your parents failed in raising you

I think you replied to the wrong account, this is a completely incoherent response

Dogs have a flag now? Truly woke has gone too far

Mmmm taffy

well there are accounts on there that do seem to like to push Russian/Chinese talking points frequently + consistently

Like what, pray tell?

You know what, that’s fair. I am a hog for dunks and we do like to deploy the ppb

What did the report say?

It is in their username, their version of Lemmy just doesn’t show it for some reason. Hexbear users have to pick a set of pronouns

If that comment would chase you away, then I think it would be good for you to be chased away

Uhh uhh no it doesn’t, you haven’t heard of .jpe? Lmao wow you’re streets behind haha

On top of all that America also just actively persecutes queer people. People will say “oh that’s just the republicans” as if that isn’t half the country and it’s not just the republicans, but a large group of democrats. Then they’ll say “oh, but we’re not as bad as [enemy of the week]” which funnily enough is actually a whatabouterismerino, but also not really a valid argument if you’re saying it’s okay to bomb a country if they’re mean to queer people. So it’s okay to be kinda mean to queer people?

On top of that there’s also the fact that some of the US’ closest allies are countries like Saudi Arabia, not to mention the many far right anti-lgbtq dictators the state has installed over the years.

On top of that the US has only recently gotten “good” on queer rights. Homosexuality wasn’t decriminalised in the whole of the US until 2003 (and we’re not talking some weird little forgotten law, it wasn’t until a supreme court decision forced several states to finally stop being bigoted.)
At the same time the GDR had decriminalised homosexuality by 1957 and with constitutional reform fully legal by 1968
The GDR did this despite inheriting the nazis legal code (according to a wikipedia source which I will not fact check.)
Would it have been acceptable, nay morally right, for the GDR to bomb the US?

definitely, but not just because of da gays

I always read it as Eddie 👉👈

Most of it, but that has nothing to do with you and is just a meagre deflection. The right response would have been “whoops my bad, didn’t notice that, I’ll do better next time” or a variation thereof.
Shifting the discussion as you are trying to do is just poor behaviour that makes your alleged genuine questions seem much less so. Sort of how like when I misgender someone I don’t go and make a big fuss about it, dig my heels in and try to start a discussion about morality or expectations. I correct my mistake and thank the person for informing me of it. It’s not a big deal unless you make it one, which you’ve done