Reminded me of this: https://xkcd.com/3102/

https://i.imgur.com/w9w0Acb.jpeg

You’re missing one major difference. US doesn’t enforce blockade over Canada

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_blockade_of_the_Gaza_Strip_(2023–present)

How morally wrong this is, is whole another discussion, just pointing out why this was never going to happen and went according to the plan.

Seizing/intercepting for deportation. Not trying to defend Israel, but it was pretty clear from the start that this was their mission, and it went perfectly according to the plan, and now media can have a field day.

EDIT: Apparently they didn’t even bother loading the boat full with aid

Imagine doing math with strings and then blaming the language not yourself

Introducing: Chlorone gas with a chance of hydrogen

There was actually recent findings about how that ad used copyrighted font and… music? Don’t remember the second thing, but funny thing is that the ad broke copyright laws

What’s bizzare to me is that the game is banned in Lithuania, but not in Latvia. The two countries are like twins.

I’m using boost and boost for lemmy tells me I have 5 new replies/messages. Unfortunately, they’re not there, so I assume a mod or user itself deleted the comment before I could read it, but the unread messages number never went down

…but I can literally send infected files thru RCS to my grandma.

And the original plan for country X was to do Y but since it never happened, it’s irrelevant and people almost never speak of it, except when it suddenly fits their narrative, no matter how stupid/disconnected it is

In other news, USSR and Gulag is exactly the comparison you were actually looking for, but no, gotta always use “nazis” because of how catchy it is to you guys

…dude, I literally talked about what happened, not what was theoretized. Do you have any idea how brutally evil things have US or other countries theoretized? Thinking and doing are two very, VERY different things. Didn’t know this needs explaining.

Google is trying to kill SMS. My new android by default has sms disabled, defaulting to RCS with “try sending sms instead if rcs fails to send” option being off by default, which makes no sense from user perspective

Nazis wanted to kill them all, not move them further away. It’s of course a shitty thing to do, but I’m getting kinda annoyed by how often people use nazis as an example for something when they were far more evil than anything that exists today, essentially downplaying or borderline normalizing nazis because of how commonly it’s now used for real life examples.

I mean, if millions of people were killed as part of genocide in that building, I’m sure no one would think of hosting events there, but you’re comparing two vastly different things. The abuse that happened in that building is awful, but stop comparing it to genocide you goofball

EDIT: And no, I never said the girls themselves burned it and then took a selfie of the crime lol. I’m talking about people who do not see the problem with burning down historical places and are expressing their will to do it or support towards it.

Good and well thought out argument, your comment definitely made me support burnings of historical places. I had to check if Im on reddit

Wait till you learn about half of the hotel resort histories. Many of them use castles and palaces that were just as mean towards slaves.

Transforming something with bad history into a hotel or resort is something that happens all the time, everywhere.

I mean, there is literally haunted hotels tourism, and those buildings have commonly seen some really dark stuff.

In my country, there is a prison hotel where I can spend a night in a building where my kind used to be… well, it’s history, so people like visiting those places, including me.

Should we burn them all?

Using historical objects where peasants were banned from, to now allowing those that were banned to explore and utilize said objects freely? The horror. What do you think happens in every historical castle around the world? Should Chinese burn down forbidden city? The building isn’t even owned by the same family anymore, but some attorney and was added to historical buildings registry. The owner already said he hopes to rebuild it as it was both a reminder of brutal history of chattel slavery and economical drive (tourism) to the region.

Good job fighting the history, you really showed them, I’m sure the people in graves feel very insulted.

This is so incredibly stupid. We might aswell cripple most of the food production and burn down entire cities since most of the America and farms used to have some form of slavery or racism. Was that building still used for slavery, or did they just attack innoncent people and damaged their own food supply + economy? Like… why? What is one good thing you accomplished while causing 5 bad things?

EDIT: Note that I’m not from US so might be missing more context, but where I live, we usually don’t burn down historic buildings or museums because they host bad history. In fact, they’re protected by law as a culturally significant objects so others could learn.

Your electronics blows up under EU mighty 240v power lines