Encapsulation == Privacy
I code stuff. I draw stuff.
I’m a Hongkonger 🇭🇰
If you’re a westerner coming here because you’re arguing with me about something in HK/China/Asia, I forgive you for your misunderstandings.
- 16 Posts
- 337 Comments
I just finished lunch and you made me consider an afternoon nap
My dad did this once.
One time I walked outside my room and see some banana peels on the hanger. I look under it and there are 3 naked bananas.
He never did it again.
Imagine celebrating new year just now and not 8 hours ago
(This comment was made by Asia gang)
Happy new year anyway!
NorthWestWind@lemmy.worldto Food Crimes - Offenses against nutrition@midwest.social•Deep Fried ButterEnglish2·4 months agoDeep fried milk is a legit great food. They were close.
US Politics is the one thing
weyou all have in common.
Well I can’t even understand my Mandarin when I speak it
Yeah. It’s not like I can communicate with someone in Cantonese when they only know Mandarin.
If the same script is considered Chinese, might as well put Japanese Kanji inside.
NorthWestWind@lemmy.worldto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•Real Programmers Implement Functions On Top Of Classes212·5 months agoIt’s just Java
EndeavourOS. It’s just easy to install and I basically use it like Arch
The problem is the ambiguity of the statement. Is it 50% of each species? Or is it 50% of all life as one set?
If it’s the former case, then sure 3.5b humans and n/2 bacteria gets snapped.
But if it’s the latter case, we group all 7b and n bacteria into one set and snap half of them. This 50% can consist of 50% humans + 50% bacteria, but there’s also a chance for it to include 0% humans + 100% bacteria. Therefore, the amount of humans snap is a random variable instead of a constant.
Say, there exists 2 humans and 98 bacteria. Consider all cells of a human one life.
50% of ALL life doesn’t care which species the life is, and therefore there’s a chance that 50 bacteria die. The probability of that happening is 98C50 / 100C50 = 98! 50! 50! / (100! 50! 48!) = (50)(49) / ((100)(99)) = 0.247
For my previous argument, I did not actually do the math. Now that I have done a little bit, the probability seems to converge at 25%
Obviously, this is based on the interpretation of “all life”. For my interpretation, “all life” includes every life in a single set, and apply the 50% snap to that. For some others however, it may be interpreted as each species in their own set, and the 50% snap is applied on each set individually.
NorthWestWind@lemmy.worldto Science Memes@mander.xyz•anyway, i started blastin'English33·5 months agoIf you include bacteria, then probably no human died from the snap. There are significantly more of them
some wish computer science was that simple
What kind of sicko try to find their repos from the recent list on the main page??
They were so smart that they went back into the water and don’t have to ever deal with capitalism
NorthWestWind@lemmy.worldto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Lifestyles of the Bronze Age FamousEnglish11·6 months ago
One step closer to the JS OS meme
NorthWestWind@lemmy.worldto Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Proof by fucking obviousnessEnglish118·6 months agoThis guy would not be happy to learn about the 1+1=2 proof
Java Applets!