Tell me that you have never ever spent a year’s salary for such a present made out of crystal & metal, without telling me that… :-)

These jerks at the top are smart enough to not use their nukes…

Read some of the old “Miss Marple” Stories, then some “Hercule Poirot” Stories.

On reddit, it was frowned upon to create a new acc after getting banned - and still it was frequently needed to do so, because of some mod gone wild.

The same jerks who have been mods on reddit are now becoming the mods on lemmy. And they still get unlimited power, and still nobody is reviewing their actions.

Now, please explain: why would anybody share such stories of getting banned?

I was wrong

So, what does it tell you?

You’re factually wrong on that aspect.

Because of 450 cases in some foreign country? Don’t be ridiculous.

This is the scenario I’m asking about.

Nobody knew your scenario before you explained it in detail. It is simply not happening.

Organisations don’t want to be bothered with such restrictions from a donor. Their principles are: fair and anonymous. It is hard enough already this way.

Yes to Life: In Spite of Everything (Viktor E. Frankl)

LMAO

I am able to think straight.

(most of the times, at least)

It us not just petty or counterproductive. It is violating the basic principle of democracy itself.

I don’t get it. Maybe I’m dumb… but:

If I am used to work with command line tools, then what do I need this GUI for?