I feel like pointing at (subconscious) racism is compatible with Occam’s razor
I feel like pointing at (subconscious) racism is compatible with Occam’s razor
Not so superior now, huh?
The division operator of a Galois field (I prefer “finite field”, because it’s more descriptive) is nothing like the what computers usually use for unsigned integers. Like, if you’re working mod 5, then 3/2 = 4 (because 2 * 4 = 8 = 3 mod 5).
Gotta love Dirichlet boundary conditions (the function has to have this value), Neumann boundary conditions (the derivative has to have this value) and Cauchy boundary conditions (both).
On the other hand, there’s a bunch of things that are so abstract that it’s difficult to give them a descriptive name, like rings, magmas and weasels
37 = 2187 white triangles. Dumbass.
Do you mean the people that think it’s a funny picture, or those that get offended just by seeing the word “mansplaining”?
Nobody is calling the ad sexist lol. The joke is that it’s a bad picture because all the women look bored/unimpressed/annoyed.
What if I don’t want to sell my soul?
Yeah I think it still needs to grow skin and feathers
The url also sets off so many alarm bells for me. Lol
It sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors
The way I see it, axioms and notation are made up but everything that follows is absolute truth
There are many other open-access journals, for example these: https://freejournals.org/. But yes, open-access is the way.
Wednesday pantsday
Footballs don’t have just hexagons 😤
… did you just add two words and a watermark to a meme instead of commenting on it?
+
is a map from N×N
to N
where a + 0 = a
and a + S(b) = S(a + b)
(S
is the successor function that gives the next number).
Then 1 + 1 = 1 + S(0) = S(1 + 0) = S(1) = 2
.
I was going to say toki pona is not quite brainfuck but at least somewhere in that direction, with its tiny vocab