Removed by mod

At what point is violence against an oppressive regime’s thugs (re: law enforcement) morally permissible? If peaceful protest becomes impossible, is violent resistance not required?

“Texas county comprised of majority stupid people.” I fixed the headline

IDF are akin to Nazi soldiers. They and their leadership deserve the same punishments as was meted out at the end of WWII. “Just following orders” is not a legal justification for war crimes. You have a legal obligation to not follow unlawful orders.

Kill your leaders if it means that’s the only way to not commit war crimes. Why this isn’t a widely adopted belief is a testament to why humanity is a lost cause.

Almost like the climate is changing.

Trump will encounter a home-grown resistance in the US if he wages war on NATO. It will start a civil war. MMW

When legal protest is made impossible, illegal resistance is a necessity.

Israel is a terrorist state and the United States is a state-sponsored of terrorism.

There are no occupying non-combatants in occupied territories.

They don’t want a faster bureaucracy, or more efficient government. The goal in cutting funding for public services is to decrease the quality of services so that they can then trick people into supporting private companies in being awarded the contracts to provide those services (cut costs in the short-term so that they can justify higher costs later).

The goal is to DESTROY government and REPLACE it with profit-driven private interests. Capitalists are the enemy.