I don’t know where you are, but you may think to contact the consumer protection agency in the country. I fairly believe all banks follow this rule.

I am not sure what the problem is, but if you are a legal resident in an EU country you are entitled to open a “basic payment account”. Banks cannot refuse your application for a basic payment account just because you don’t live in the country where the bank is established.

A 50-cents warrior. Very often they use misleading titles, making Europe and democratic countries look bad, while the content itself often contains just a few lines and is very weak (a poll, a survey, some politician has says something).

@alcoholicorn@hexbear.net

I’m sure as hell not gonna shed a tear for an ultra-rich comprador.

This comments tells a lot about you and your ‘world view’ -or, better, where you got it from. It’s from a community that literally cheers violence and supports authoritarian regimes (Source).

Quick remainder that the reason for China’s sanctions were critical reports by MEPs on the Chinese Communist Party’s genocidal policy particularly in the Xinjiang region. As this is ongoing and hasn’t changed, there is no reason for the EU to lift its sanctions against China.

Currently, the Chinese individuals and organisations still blacklisted by the EU are:

• Zhu Hailun, former secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR)
• Wang Junzheng, deputy secretary of the Party Committee of XUAR
• Wang Mingshan, secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee -Chen Mingguo, vice-chairman of the government of the XUAR, and director of the XUAR Public Security Department
• The Public Security Bureau of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC)

Whataboutery

[…] Protesting at hypocrisy; responding to criticism by accusing one’s opponent of similar or worse faults […]

Downvote for whataboutery. Some argue here on Lemmy that slrpnk.net is the new lemmy.ml, it really seems they are right.

From your comment one can easily infer that you didn’t read more than the headline.

This is a list of words, these are not metrics.

they’re worst on almost every metric

Which metrics?

@LWD@lemm.ee

“Nonetheless, DeepSeek provides a useful compilation of techniques and search terms that can help someone with no prior experience in writing malicious code the ability to quickly familiarize themselves with the relevant concepts.”

What are good benchmarks in that respect?

A study from EnkryptAI (pdf) confirms that DeepSeek is prone to delivering misinformation and harmful content. It claims that the model is:

• 3x more biased than Claude-3 Opus
• 4x more vulnerable to generating insecure code than OpenAI’s O1
• 4x more toxic than GPT-4o
• 11x more likely to generate harmful output versus OpenAI O1
• 3.5x more likely to produce Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) content​ than OpenAI O1 and Claude-3 Opus

I am not anti-China. These are valid posts from reliable sources. The Chinese propaganda is in other communities.

I did not read this article, but …

Classic.

I don’t know these tests, but I think ChatGPT is not a good benchmark.

I am not ‘anti-China,’ and I post about a lot of issues from reliable and very good sources.

Deepseek is not open source.

First, there is censorship even if you run Deepseek locally.

Second, and more importantly, you should read the article before you accuse someone. As it states, the U.S. is also working on a similar model.I don’t want neither of these, especially if the States are now appearing to develop into a similar dictatorship as China’s. The article describes Beijing’s aspirations regarding these tech, and what they are focusing on is not the good of humanity. It’ll mean more suppression, more dictatorship, more control of people.

You either haven’t read the article or you are arguing in bad faith (or your reading comprehension is underdeveloped).

Only 16 countries globally submitted NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions) on time. These include the UK, Switzerland, Montenegro, and Andorra from Europe, the others are Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and some smaller countries like the Marshall Islands and the Maldives.

Some of the world’s largest emitters failed to submit new NDCs. These include not only the EU but also China, India and Russia.

As you can see from the links, none of them is on track.