- 245 Posts
- 41 Comments
1·7 days agoDas ist, glaube ich, keine gute Idee, weil dann die USA (oder wer auch immer als “Feind” definiert wird) immer noch die Kontrolle über Dein Leben hat. Lebe lieber so, wie Du das selbst willst. Ich definiere mich selbst nicht darüber, wer gegen mich lobbyiert.
1·9 days agoSorry, I replaced the link now.
0·11 days agoYes, but he ‘fights to stay in the US’ nevertheless. What does that tell us?
0·16 days agoI don’t know where you are, but you may think to contact the consumer protection agency in the country. I fairly believe all banks follow this rule.
I am not sure what the problem is, but if you are a legal resident in an EU country you are entitled to open a “basic payment account”. Banks cannot refuse your application for a basic payment account just because you don’t live in the country where the bank is established.
A 50-cents warrior. Very often they use misleading titles, making Europe and democratic countries look bad, while the content itself often contains just a few lines and is very weak (a poll, a survey, some politician has says something).
I’m sure as hell not gonna shed a tear for an ultra-rich comprador.
This comments tells a lot about you and your ‘world view’ -or, better, where you got it from. It’s from a community that literally cheers violence and supports authoritarian regimes (Source).
21·9 months agoQuick remainder that the reason for China’s sanctions were critical reports by MEPs on the Chinese Communist Party’s genocidal policy particularly in the Xinjiang region. As this is ongoing and hasn’t changed, there is no reason for the EU to lift its sanctions against China.
Currently, the Chinese individuals and organisations still blacklisted by the EU are:
- Zhu Hailun, former secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR)
- Wang Junzheng, deputy secretary of the Party Committee of XUAR
- Wang Mingshan, secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee -Chen Mingguo, vice-chairman of the government of the XUAR, and director of the XUAR Public Security Department
- The Public Security Bureau of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC)
[…] Protesting at hypocrisy; responding to criticism by accusing one’s opponent of similar or worse faults […]
Downvote for whataboutery. Some argue here on Lemmy that slrpnk.net is the new lemmy.ml, it really seems they are right.
From your comment one can easily infer that you didn’t read more than the headline.
This is a list of words, these are not metrics.
they’re worst on almost every metric
Which metrics?
15·11 months ago“Nonetheless, DeepSeek provides a useful compilation of techniques and search terms that can help someone with no prior experience in writing malicious code the ability to quickly familiarize themselves with the relevant concepts.”
What are good benchmarks in that respect?
A study from EnkryptAI (pdf) confirms that DeepSeek is prone to delivering misinformation and harmful content. It claims that the model is:
- 3x more biased than Claude-3 Opus
- 4x more vulnerable to generating insecure code than OpenAI’s O1
- 4x more toxic than GPT-4o
- 11x more likely to generate harmful output versus OpenAI O1
- 3.5x more likely to produce Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) content than OpenAI O1 and Claude-3 Opus
I am not anti-China. These are valid posts from reliable sources. The Chinese propaganda is in other communities.
I did not read this article, but …
Classic.
I don’t know these tests, but I think ChatGPT is not a good benchmark.
No, it means that the Chinese government is burning its own soil and air much faster than the West, and China has much higher CO2 emissions per capita than the European Union and the rest of the democratic world.
Edit for an addition: China’s CO₂ emissions exceed those of the entire West: The suppressed power question in the climate debate