Are entomologists known for withholding information from their SO?

That’s what we thought until it turned out that Elmo was the real predator all along.

K

I’m whooshing on this one :)

But as far as know, nothing in the cop rule book says an anaconda can’t be a cop.

Weird, I want cops to not strangle someone because they may have used a fake bill, or shoot someone because they were called there to help with a mental health crisis, or shoot someone because they busted into the wrong apartment, or to flash bang a baby.

But I suppose that means I want them to be kind to someone actively shooting kids.

Still not describing anything that indicates it backs it.

Good news though, I did reply again so feel free to condescendingly demonstrate your intelligence again.

But it’s not backed by energy.

The energy was consumed in the process of creating the crypto, that energy no longer exists and since it doesn’t exist it can’t back anything.

Must have been built in House

ANEN aND THANK YOU TO THW TROOPEE 4 there SERVICE!

Your message reads kinda douchey.

This person looked in the mirror this morning and thought to themselves “THEY are the problem!!”

Italics, bold, all caps

Hmm… are you the person in the comic? Is this new canon?

Is “geys beyond me” the new “streets ahead”?

I believe it’s assuming you’re not taking breaks, in which case I think they’re a bit more reasonable is expected walking speed but perhaps less reasonable in regards to a persons ability to go without sleeping :)

I say this seriously, you’re having far too strong of reactions to pretty minor things. I understand you may be trolling, in which case bravo. But if you aren’t trolling you may want to consider talking to someone about what seems like an abundance of emotion that’s unrelated to what’s being discussed here.

Anyway, hope you’re doing well and find some peace.

I just want to point out the irony that you’re ragging on the other poster for too many words while your single sentence vaguely alludes to something wrong without actually specifying what’s wrong.

I think because this is more about exposing corruption in the DoJ than an expose about Caterpillar. Not mentioning the company in the headline can inform you that the heart of the article is the DoJ so that you’re coming into it with the right context.