ExFed

Definitely unpopular by the literal statistics. Definitely correct about the health benefits. Definitely something I don’t do.

Also, it’s a little strange that some desserts are only ever for special occasions (like cake), but others which may be just as difficult/expensive to make are considered regular fare (like ice cream).

It’s right there in the article.

The resolution called on BP to explain how its pursuit of rising oil and gas production aligned with a world shifting away from fossil fuels.

“The question is simple: how does BP plan to create value for shareholders as oil and gas demand declines?” said Mark van Baal, the founder of Follow This. “BP would rather antagonise its shareholders than answer it.”

That seems perfectly rational to me.

You could probably, for most regions in the world, make the reasonable assumption that, on average, the effect balances out; you might be able to drive somewhere and commit a crime, but so can someone else from somewhere else, and so on. Obviously, places which receive a lot of travel are exceptions to this rule, just like places where would-be criminal travelers reside (I’m looking at you, suburbia).

Of course, I’m just speculating in hopes someone else has some real data to back up my claims…

I can’t see some tasks, particularly booking concert tickets, being done by AI agents

I’m not sure I follow… Care to elaborate?

I can absolutely see the potential for abuse and a race to produce faster agents. Now that I think about it, before too long “Time To First Token” will become an uninteresting metric, and agents will all be steerable/interruptible mid-task, enabling legit real-time language processing (as opposed to the batch-mode they currently have).