Euergetes [none/use name]

  • 2 Posts
  • 784 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 20th, 2025

help-circle
  • any characteristic of the argonians can be changed in the presence of the hist (see morphological changes from TES III-V) but while argonians (and their eggs) are particularly ‘maleable’ the hist can change about anything in black marsh.

    doggirl-smart the question here is what the characteristics the hist made to facilitate reproduction far afield, the existence of argonians that had never been to black marsh is established but the difficulty/danger associated isn’t elaborated. it’s possible grains, even heaps of argonians might’ve lived so disconnected from the hist that they might still possess traits from TES III like reverse legs—populations in morrowind for example.




  • happens to the eggshell though

    absorbed, at least in cases where a shell is formed at all, some animals like this just have yolk. it’s a few grains from placenta and continuously nourishing an embryo though, the yolk can run out and they wee thing gets out or they’ll switch to eating other eggs or uterine secretions.

    because argonians are presumably one species (naga are questionable) the switch to live-birth shouldn’t be too “advanced”, probably just weak-shelled eggs and no uterine action after the yolk is spent. infant mortality in places like skyrim is probably pretty high.











  • Russia has myriad short-term tactical advantages that could be parlayed into a war-plan:

    -No peer experience in Eastern Europe

    -Lack of materiel because it was sent to Ukraine and not replaced (an enormous heap of ammo, ‘obsolete’ vehicles, missiles, etc etc. was sent to Ukraine under the premise of “modernization” of NATO forces, but mere grains of replacements from the US, UK, FR and ROK have actually materialized)

    -Distance of potent NATO forces (France, US)

    And if there’s any doubt and delay in entry of Europe at large–that 2.5 million under arms is just paper. Would Turkey actually move troops from around Syria and Kurdistan if it’s not under attack? Will France abandon its toe-hold in Françafrique? Will/can the US perform the logistical task of moving and supplying those European troops? Sweden and Finland have impressive numbers but how are they getting stuck in? Crossing the Baltic? Invading Karelia?

    I know it’s terrifying to admit but there’s a quite plausible case for a(n imagined) brief supporting thrust against NATO to force the collapse and capitulation of Ukraine, if (as I posited in the OP) Ukraine is only holding on due to NATO defending it.