Happier then I am

deleted by creator

caring about the innocent is ridiculous

Holy shit

deleted by creator

If people were less shitty I’d be less misanthropic

i don’t think there’s a set # of peeps putting out a set # of dollars.

There is obviously a limited amount of each though. Maybe some people will give some months and not others, or might stretch their budgets more then other times, but there is a limited amount of resources and its not enough for everyone who needs help.

they did get a car with the money

You are talking an awful lot about a situation you clearly don’t know.

https://hexbear.net/comment/6174015

I agree with this comment about 90%.

What a way to go

I believe some women wanted to be able to use it to describe themselves.

There’s a reddit bridge to lemmy, if you’re looking for an existing solution. If not it wouldn’t be hard to write one, no. Here is a lemmy library I’ve used a bit before. Or you could just use the raw api. Seems like an easy beginner project to me.

But dirt owl, how fast will we be done?

In it for the love of the game

Additionally, GPT-3 needs to “drink” (i.e., consume) a 500ml bottle of water for roughly 10 – 50 medium-length responses, depending on when and where it is deployed.

Worth noting that this water usage is mostly from the electricity, making electricity uses water. You are pretty accurate in your assessment and I’m surprised this is an askchapo post rather then an effort post. It is overblown. It honestly strikes me as a distraction from the actual climate polluters. A small reduction of the meat industry would be massively more impactful then stopping all AI models. There’s other criticisms of AI that work better imo.

it also helps how for the last few years they been using more renewable energies, which cut out a lot of the emissions in regards for AI stuff no?

I mean not really imo. If that electricity could have been redirected to turning off a fossil fuel plant then its still the same “pool” being used. If a datacenter uses 90% renewable but that means the city uses more fossil fuels instead of that renewable, its a wash.

edit: Here’s another link I found when searching around, his math works to 0.3wh for small queries. Obviously consider the source etc etc but I personally don’t see an issue with this calculations. He also covers training and gpu production costs if you are interested (though briefly).

:pooh-wtf:

Buy me a cigarette please

Some kind of alligator lizard? Doesn’t look quite like the ones I normally see.

Yea, good luck convincing parents of climate science.

A lot of providers (including deepseek) offer an openai compatible api, actually very surprised this project doesn’t use that.