Context matters and if people just throw praise around without reading the situation it won’t work anyway. Sugarcoating is still valid to make people feel good about themselves, but it should a well timed sidenote, not more

Yeah I feel you. It’s defo some work to go through it haha. My gf unpauses her hinge for a minute and gets like 7 likes lol.

Facts. I feel like dating apps work great for people who struggle to approach strangers. The people I met with also struggled with this, but are actually super social individuals.

Dunno Hinge works fine for me as a guy. Not many bots and no camgirls. But compared to my gf I have to like more while she can just sit back wait for likes to come in. It’s true tho that the girls liking me match better with what I’m looking for compared to the guys my gf receives. It’s not like super random or proportionally less attractive girls either.

What I really enjoy about it (so far) is that intentions are clear beforehand. I don’t have to overthink a hookup convo in a bar with some random person who will most likely reject me anyway.

Well how many people did the US kill? Any data on it?

Is it dumb because it is not the closes equivalent? Yes.

Is it dumb because this doesn’t get sold frequently? No.

In Nuremberg we have the same thing, but it’s just multiple smaller sausages instead of 1. I’d argue you find the potatoes/kraut salad x sausage combo almost everywhere.

Huh

I thought it wasn’t meant to be expensive :D

And then there are people who switch between both types. I think in professional language they call it ‘rollercoaster personality’ /s

And it will never stop. But interesting read thx :)

There is no unpolished reality… depressive thoughts are not more real than happy thoughts even though it might be convenient to assume so sometimes.

Depression

There’s nothing cringier to me than uttering the phrase ‘let’s connect’ - in a work related context

All these news pieces about A.I. killing ancient company xyz …

Pff… you’re way too nice to not be a liberal

Beer it is. Or you play with groups of friends

Looks like a wild ride

I mean we’re here in the comments to exchange perspectives primarily. Never saw anyone quoting research papers. There’s no rule about forbidding comments to be biased or opinionated. So I’d say our access to any form of potential objective truth, as fundamental basis for discussion, is fairly limited. World news is not only about scientifically validated facts. It’s rather a fast paced informational feed, where you have to balance speed and factual quality.

And we had context for the anticar lobby comment, so it’s not like the person said: look, here is the irrefutable truth from an independent source. They rather said: Look here are some reasons for why XYZ is bad.

I don’t have a problem with it, besides it being a lazy and hard to read solution.

I’m not sure if you know what objective truth means, but why would you expect it from an anticar lobby sub? Like, it’s a political movement… not a scientific research facility? It’s not their goal to be objective, but to push for change. Not saying the things they stated are wrong, but they are first and foremost moral statements.

Where do they say it represents a form of ‘objective truth’?

But I agree walls of text are not nice, at least try to summarize it a bit to make it readable…

Love his videos