• FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Except you’ll have to keep a copy of Chrome handy because this is less about what software you’re using and more about which apps are attested and approved for that website.

    Once your bank says “we’re requiring this” it’s kinda over isn’t it?

    • Goodie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your bank will only do it, if, and only if, Chrome is a majority of browsers they see.

      How do you stop that? By not using it.

      Everyone keeps postulating over a terrible future, but won’t actually do anything now, today, to help prevent it.

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bank already has your money. Asking you to install a free app to use their services would not be seen by regulators as unreasonable. Especially when they play the security argument.

        I don’t see how Chrome has to be in the majority for some sectors to start relying on these kinds of attestations. Safari already has a similar mechanism, so that right there is the majority of mobile users when you include Chrome.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But Chrome is already the dominant browser, and Firefox has like 2% market share last time I checked.