Why YSK: It appears several Lemmy Instances are flagged as suspicious and at least 1 instance intentionally using the name of ransomware. A couple of the big enterprise monitoring suites (Fortiguard, ZScaler) will flag your account and may end up with you being pulled into an office for an explanation, or worse.
TL;DR: Keep browsing to your local instance at work for now.
I imagine the socialist/ML and pro-union content also plays into this (speaking as a socialist/ML and extremely pro-union, mind you). Corporations hate and are terrified of any sort of dissidence that threatens their profits and will absolutely police your activity on it. Weirdly enough Western “freedom of speech” doesn’t seem to extend to this kind of stuff in practice, can’t imagine why.
More likely op being a dumbass and using work resources to fuck around on the clock.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I do. I also competently complete all the work that’s given to me and then some. I’m being paid to do a job and I do it well. If I’m not engaged in work and caught up I’m going to discretely “fuck around” while still being available for whatever comes up.
Oh, I could be doing more work? – I’d love to … for more pay or time off. The expectation of “looking busy” and “busy work” is for jackasses.
deleted by creator
The company firewall very likely is using a “content filtering” function which for Sonicwall, for example, is a subscription service where the admin can select any number of “categories” of content to block. I found lemmy.world was being blocked because Sonicwall had that domain categorized as “gaming” which was disallowed. I reported the error to Sonicwall that it should be “social media” but haven’t heard back (it takes a while) but some companies might block that category also. In short, it might not be blocked because of any positive action by your company but instead by accident because whoever first classified the site didn’t understand what it was.
I’m less worried about what they actively block with an in-your-face “this content is forbidden” screen and more worried about what they might silently flag to my supervisor, tbh. They’re unlikely to block pro-union content, for example, but might silently track who’s going on those kinds of sites.
Your personal security concerns are valid but every company is different, and it seems most people don’t work at a firm their whole lives anymore so there is less trust and less loyalty and decency, really. In my case the wifi given to employees for their personal phones is totally segregated from the work LAN so while it is definitely monitored and protected in the same way, its far less of a concern for company security. It is also throttled so watching videos is almost impossible, it blocks a hoard of malicious stuff (which makes using it safer for the user than when they leave), and many of those using it are on cheap limited plans so they might not be able to leave their comms open to their family or check the location of their kids during the workday, or even get updates otherwise. Many use it to stream radio stations or listen to podcasts usually into earbuds. Properly classified porn sites, etc. are blocked. However, I recently heard there will be changes imposed on us from above and all these users may soon be kicked off this wifi entirely. Managers and office workers will certainly be still allowed to use it but the people who really need it? I guess they are SOL.
Yea, and the filters are not that accurate either.
Tried to login into Telegram at work, and it was blocked for terrorism lmao.
Gave me a scare, but never got a talking to about it.
The only people to know about it would be IT, if we even have an alert for it (we generally don’t) because we don’t care about someone trying to access something is blocked, we know its blocked so its no threat. Things we care about are real security concerns like when your machine suddenly is downloading a bunch of exe files, connecting to a database server in Brazil, scanning the network for open file shares and running powershell scripts to encrypt every file it finds. Most well-set-up places are running endpoint protection now though so the first thing you’ll notice is you will lose your internet. THEN you might get visited, but by then you’ll probably be calling us since nothing works LOL
Given that I can literally access my unions resources from my employers internet, I doubt that’s an issue.
Could it be that in your country your employer is required by law, or there exists an union contract that specifies your right to access this information?
it couldnt be, we just established that “Western “freedom of speech” doesn’t seem to extend to this kind of stuff in practice”