• Treevan 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As their specialised knowledge reaches the edge of the circle, their general knowledge updating should retract.

    Everyone has met a PhD that is almost entirely clueless in other areas. Not their fault though, don’t get me wrong.

    Edit: The person that downvoted must be Dr. Climate Change Denier. Dr. Covid Denier has joined the fray.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny but you see the same thing in sports, or I see it specifically in hockey. Phenom kid gets drafted and at 18 has the social skills of the hockey puck he’s playing with. By the time he’s 36 he’s not the player he once was but is a more well rounded individual with age and experience. When you focus all your energy to become the best at something, like a PhD, athlete, musician, whatever, you sacrifice some things along the way for sure.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When u look at most people I feel like the trending alternative at 18-50 y is personality of a hockey puck and also skills of a hockey puck, with the reasoning ability of the hockey puck.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not universally true. I know several people with PhD who have encyclopedic knowledge completely outside their specialisation. Some people are just super intelligent, talented and have enormous memory. The world is not fair.