• Oliver@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Probably because the need of moderation.

    If you host an instance and let people in (even if it’s a limited circle, i.E. your students) you are responsible for moderation. I think that’s something institutions back off currently.

    For an mail server that’s much easier.

      • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Many Universities already have their own dedicated subreddits that are usually moderated by a mix of faculty, staff, and students. I know of at least one sub moderated in part by the chair oftheh math department, who is as funny as they are savage.

        An above-average level of shitposting goes on, sure, but it’s also a great venue for the school’s online community to engage across organizational boundaries.

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          People can reply to posts on Twitter, and yet they have official Twitter accounts.

            • kadu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 years ago

              Twitter’s moderation barely works. Regardless, I still don’t understand what your point is.

              If you post on Twitter, get public replies and report a troll… How’s that different on Mastodon?

    • lemme_at_it@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Universities used to have students involved in publishing magazines as journalists, editors etc. This is the evolution. I’m sure a decent sized uni could find or create a student group who can be responsible for moderation under an official administrator.